Zhang Mingliang, Brenneman Susan K, Carter Chureen T, Essoi Breanna L, Farahi Kamyar, Johnson Michael P, Lee Seina, Olson William H
Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, USA.
Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Optum Life Sciences, Eden Prairie, MN, USA.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 Jun 16;9:777-84. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S85773. eCollection 2015.
Moderate to severe plaque psoriasis has a serious effect on health-related quality of life. Patients treated with biologic medications place importance on satisfaction and treatment frequency options. We assessed patient-reported treatment satisfaction and dosing frequency choice with biologics.
We used a health care claims database to identify patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Participants completed the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication. Results were compared between patients experienced with biologics (adalimumab, etanercept, or ustekinumab) or not (cyclosporine or methotrexate). Participants were asked for their choices of dosing options of once every 1-2 weeks, 3-4 weeks, 1-2 months, or 2-3 months. Participants were also asked for their choices of dosing options of every 1, 2, 3, and so on up to every 12+ weeks.
A total of 426 patients completed the survey (263 biologic-experienced and 163 biologic-naïve patients). Patient satisfaction with psoriasis treatment was significantly higher in the biologic-experienced cohort. The most frequently chosen option (38.8% of all participating patients) was every 2-3 months; 37.3% chose once every 1-2 weeks. Significant differences were found in the percentage of biologic-naïve patients choosing 2-3-month (49.7%) over 1-2-week (20.9%) dosing (P<0.001). Among biologic-experienced patients, the difference between the percentage of patients choosing the 2-3-month (35.7%) and 1-2-week (41.8%) options was not significant (P=0.264). The two most often week-specific intervals chosen by biologic-naïve patients were 12+ weeks (42.3%) and 4 weeks (15.6%). The biologic-experienced patients most often chose 12+ weeks (31.2%) and 1 week (25.9%).
Patients using biologics reported satisfaction with their treatment, which may positively affect outcomes. Longer dosing intervals were chosen most frequently among all patients combined. Reports of patient satisfaction with prior treatments and choices regarding dosing frequency, among all other considerations, should be evaluated in determining an appropriate biologic medication for psoriasis.
中度至重度斑块状银屑病对健康相关生活质量有严重影响。接受生物药物治疗的患者重视满意度和治疗频率选择。我们评估了患者报告的生物制剂治疗满意度和给药频率选择。
我们使用医疗保健索赔数据库识别中度至重度斑块状银屑病患者。参与者完成了药物治疗满意度问卷。对有生物制剂使用经验(阿达木单抗、依那西普或乌司奴单抗)和无生物制剂使用经验(环孢素或甲氨蝶呤)的患者的结果进行了比较。参与者被问及他们对每1 - 2周、3 - 4周、1 - 2个月或2 - 3个月给药方案的选择。参与者还被问及他们对每1、2、3等直至每12周以上给药方案的选择。
共有426名患者完成了调查(263名有生物制剂使用经验的患者和163名无生物制剂使用经验的患者)。有生物制剂使用经验的队列中患者对银屑病治疗的满意度显著更高。最常选择的选项(占所有参与患者的38.8%)是每2 - 3个月一次;37.3%的患者选择每1 - 2周一次。无生物制剂使用经验的患者选择2 - 3个月(49.7%)给药方案而非1 - 2周(20.9%)给药方案的百分比存在显著差异(P<0.001)。在有生物制剂使用经验的患者中,选择2 - 3个月(35.7%)和1 - 2周(41.8%)给药方案的患者百分比差异不显著(P = 0.264)。无生物制剂使用经验的患者最常选择的两个特定周期间隔是12周以上(42.3%)和4周(15.6%)。有生物制剂使用经验的患者最常选择12周以上(31.2%)和1周(25.9%)。
使用生物制剂的患者报告对治疗满意,这可能对治疗结果产生积极影响。在所有患者中,最常选择的是较长的给药间隔。在确定适合银屑病的生物药物时,应评估患者对先前治疗的满意度报告以及给药频率选择等所有其他因素。