Farahnik Benjamin, Patel Viraat, Beroukhim Kourosh, Zhu Tian Hao, Abrouk Michael, Nakamura Mio, Singh Rasnik, Lee Kristina, Bhutani Tina, Koo John
University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT.
School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine.
Psoriasis (Auckl). 2016 Jul 28;6:105-111. doi: 10.2147/PTT.S98952. eCollection 2016.
The efficacy and safety of biologic and phototherapy in treating moderate-to-severe psoriasis is well known. However, some patients may not respond well to biologic agents or phototherapy on their own and may require combination therapy. Skillfully combining a biologic agent and phototherapy may provide an additive improvement without much increase in risks.
To summarize the current state of evidence for the efficacy and safety of combining biologics with phototherapy in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.
We conducted an extensive search on Pubmed database for English language literature that evaluated the use of a combination of biologic and phototherapy for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis through January 2016. The search included the following key-words: psoriasis, etanercept, adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab, biologics, phototherapy, and combination therapy.
The primary literature included randomized controlled trials, a head-to-head study, open-label controlled and uncontrolled trials, case series, and case reports. Etanercept was used in over half of the reported cases, but other biologic agents used included ustekinumab, adalimumab, and infliximab. The vast majority of phototherapy was narrowband ultraviolet B (NBUVB) radiation. Most cases reported enhanced improvement with combination therapy. Serious adverse events throughout the study duration were reported in <3% of the patients. Long-term adverse events cannot be excluded.
Combination of biologic and phototherapy appears to be a viable clinical strategy in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis not responsive to monotherapy, despite limitations in the data available. NBUVB in combination with biologics appears to be especially effective. However, the long-term impact of these combinations is yet to be determined.
生物制剂和光疗在治疗中重度银屑病方面的疗效和安全性是众所周知的。然而,一些患者可能对生物制剂或光疗单独治疗反应不佳,可能需要联合治疗。巧妙地将生物制剂和光疗联合使用可能会在风险增加不多的情况下提供额外的改善效果。
总结生物制剂与光疗联合治疗中重度斑块状银屑病的疗效和安全性的现有证据状况。
我们在PubMed数据库中广泛检索截至2016年1月评估生物制剂与光疗联合用于治疗中重度银屑病的英文文献。检索词包括:银屑病、依那西普、阿达木单抗、英夫利昔单抗、乌司奴单抗、生物制剂、光疗和联合治疗。
原始文献包括随机对照试验、头对头研究、开放标签对照和非对照试验、病例系列以及病例报告。超过一半的报告病例使用了依那西普,但使用的其他生物制剂包括乌司奴单抗、阿达木单抗和英夫利昔单抗。绝大多数光疗是窄谱中波紫外线(NBUVB)照射。大多数病例报告联合治疗有更好的改善效果。在整个研究期间,<3%的患者报告了严重不良事件。不能排除长期不良事件。
尽管现有数据存在局限性,但生物制剂与光疗联合似乎是治疗对单一疗法无反应的中重度银屑病的一种可行临床策略。NBUVB与生物制剂联合似乎特别有效。然而,这些联合治疗的长期影响尚待确定。