Harari Colin M, Magagna Michelle, Bedoya Mariajose, Lee Fred T, Lubner Meghan G, Hinshaw J Louis, Ziemlewicz Timothy, Brace Christopher L
From the Departments of Radiology (C.M.H., M.M., M.B., F.T.L., M.G.L., J.L.H., T.Z., C.L.B.), Biomedical Engineering (F.T.L., C.L.B.), and Medical Physics (M.B., C.L.B.), University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Institutes for Medical Research, 1111 Highland Ave, WIMR 1141, Madison, WI 53705.
Radiology. 2016 Jan;278(1):95-103. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015142151. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
To compare microwave ablation zones created by using sequential or simultaneous power delivery in ex vivo and in vivo liver tissue.
All procedures were approved by the institutional animal care and use committee. Microwave ablations were performed in both ex vivo and in vivo liver models with a 2.45-GHz system capable of powering up to three antennas simultaneously. Two- and three-antenna arrays were evaluated in each model. Sequential and simultaneous ablations were created by delivering power (50 W ex vivo, 65 W in vivo) for 5 minutes per antenna (10 and 15 minutes total ablation time for sequential ablations, 5 minutes for simultaneous ablations). Thirty-two ablations were performed in ex vivo bovine livers (eight per group) and 28 in the livers of eight swine in vivo (seven per group). Ablation zone size and circularity metrics were determined from ablations excised postmortem. Mixed effects modeling was used to evaluate the influence of power delivery, number of antennas, and tissue type.
On average, ablations created by using the simultaneous power delivery technique were larger than those with the sequential technique (P < .05). Simultaneous ablations were also more circular than sequential ablations (P = .0001). Larger and more circular ablations were achieved with three antennas compared with two antennas (P < .05). Ablations were generally smaller in vivo compared with ex vivo.
The use of multiple antennas and simultaneous power delivery creates larger, more confluent ablations with greater temperatures than those created with sequential power delivery.
比较在离体和活体肝组织中使用顺序或同时输送能量所产生的微波消融区。
所有程序均获机构动物护理和使用委员会批准。在离体和活体肝模型中使用能够同时为多达三个天线供电的2.45GHz系统进行微波消融。在每个模型中评估双天线和三天线阵列。通过每根天线输送能量(离体50W,活体65W)5分钟(顺序消融总消融时间为10和15分钟,同时消融5分钟)来创建顺序和同时消融。在离体牛肝中进行了32次消融(每组8次),在8头猪的活体肝脏中进行了28次消融(每组7次)。从死后切除的消融组织中确定消融区大小和圆形度指标。使用混合效应模型评估能量输送、天线数量和组织类型的影响。
平均而言,使用同时能量输送技术产生的消融区比顺序技术产生的更大(P <.05)。同时消融也比顺序消融更接近圆形(P =.0001)。与双天线相比,三天线实现了更大且更接近圆形的消融(P <.05)。与离体相比,活体中的消融通常较小。
与顺序能量输送相比,使用多个天线和同时能量输送可产生更大、更融合且温度更高的消融区。