Ma Chunming, Liu Yue, Liu Xiaoli, Yin Fuzai, Lu Qiang
The First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, China.
The First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, China
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2016 Apr;55(4):363-7. doi: 10.1177/0009922815591886. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
The aim of this study was to compare different methods of screening for hypertension in Han adolescents. We analyzed data on 3136 Han adolescents (1601 boys and 1535 girls) aged 13 to 17 years from the adolescents hypertension survey of Qinhuangdao in 2006. The blood pressure was classified as without hypertension and with hypertension, consistent with the 2004 Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents guidelines and the selected screening methods. Sensitivity and specificity were then calculated according to gender range. Somu's formulas and the table proposed by Chiolero had low sensitivities (58.4% to 83.1%), despite good specificities (99.0% to 100.0%). The tables proposed by Mitchell and Kaelber had high sensitivities (100%), but their specificities were low (62.0% to 73.8%). Blood pressure-to-height ratio (BPHR) was a good compromise between sensitivities (boys 99.1% and girls 98.9%) and specificities (boys 91.0% and girls 94.9%). As screening tools, the table proposed by Mitchell and Kaelber and BPHR have high sensitivities. However, BPHR demonstrated specific advantages, and it does not require tables.
本研究旨在比较汉族青少年高血压的不同筛查方法。我们分析了2006年秦皇岛青少年高血压调查中3136名13至17岁汉族青少年(1601名男孩和1535名女孩)的数据。根据2004年儿童和青少年高血压工作组指南及所选筛查方法,将血压分为无高血压和有高血压。然后根据性别范围计算敏感性和特异性。Somu公式和Chiolero提出的表格敏感性较低(58.4%至83.1%),尽管特异性较好(99.0%至100.0%)。Mitchell和Kaelber提出的表格敏感性较高(100%),但其特异性较低(62.0%至73.8%)。血压身高比(BPHR)在敏感性(男孩99.1%,女孩98.9%)和特异性(男孩91.0%,女孩94.9%)之间取得了较好的平衡。作为筛查工具,Mitchell和Kaelber提出的表格以及BPHR具有较高的敏感性。然而,BPHR显示出特定优势,且无需表格。