Suppr超能文献

学习任务对海马体中刺激前后续记忆效应的影响。

The effects of study task on prestimulus subsequent memory effects in the hippocampus.

作者信息

de Chastelaine Marianne, Rugg Michael D

机构信息

Center for Vital Longevity and School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, the University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, Texas.

出版信息

Hippocampus. 2015 Nov;25(11):1217-23. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22489. Epub 2015 Jul 24.

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was employed to examine the effects of a study task manipulation on pre-stimulus activity in the hippocampus predictive of later successful recollection. Eighteen young participants were scanned while making either animacy or syllable judgments on visually presented study words. Cues presented before each word denoted which judgment should be made. Following the study phase, a surprise recognition memory test was administered in which each test item had to be endorsed as "Remembered," "Known," or "New." As expected, "deep" animacy judgments led to better memory for study items than did "shallow" syllable judgments. In both study tasks, pre-stimulus subsequent recollection effects were evident in the interval between the cue and the study item in bilateral anterior hippocampus. However, the direction of the effects differed according to the study task: whereas pre-stimulus hippocampal activity on animacy trials was greater for later recollected items than items judged old on the basis of familiarity (replicating prior findings), these effects reversed for syllable trials. We propose that the direction of pre-stimulus hippocampal subsequent memory effects depends on whether an optimal pre-stimulus task set facilitates study processing that is conducive or unconducive to the formation of contextually rich episodic memories.

摘要

功能磁共振成像(fMRI)被用于检验一项研究任务操作对海马体中刺激前活动的影响,这种活动可预测随后的成功回忆。18名年轻参与者在对视觉呈现的学习单词进行生动性或音节判断时接受了扫描。每个单词之前呈现的提示表明应该做出哪种判断。在学习阶段之后,进行了一次意外的识别记忆测试,其中每个测试项目都必须被判定为“记得”“知道”或“新的”。正如预期的那样,与“浅层次”的音节判断相比,“深层次”的生动性判断能带来更好的学习项目记忆。在两项学习任务中,双侧前海马体中提示与学习项目之间的间隔期内,刺激前后续回忆效应均很明显。然而,效应的方向因学习任务而异:在生动性试验中,对于后来回忆起来的项目,刺激前海马体活动比对基于熟悉度判断为旧的项目更大(重复了先前的研究结果),而在音节试验中这些效应则相反。我们认为,刺激前海马体后续记忆效应的方向取决于刺激前的最佳任务集是否促进了有利于或不利于形成情境丰富的情景记忆的学习加工。

相似文献

1
The effects of study task on prestimulus subsequent memory effects in the hippocampus.
Hippocampus. 2015 Nov;25(11):1217-23. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22489. Epub 2015 Jul 24.
2
Prestimulus hippocampal activity predicts later recollection.
Hippocampus. 2010 Jan;20(1):24-8. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20663.
3
The neural correlates of recollection and retrieval monitoring: Relationships with age and recollection performance.
Neuroimage. 2016 Sep;138:164-175. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.071. Epub 2016 May 4.
5
The hippocampus is sensitive to the mismatch in novelty between items and their contexts.
Brain Res. 2015 Mar 30;1602:144-52. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.01.033. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
6
Pre-stimulus neural activity predicts successful encoding of inter-item associations.
Neuroimage. 2015 Jan 15;105:21-31. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.046. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
8
Neural reinstatement and the amount of information recollected.
Brain Res. 2014 Sep 25;1582:125-38. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.07.026. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
10
Mechanisms underlying encoding of short-lived versus durable episodic memories.
J Neurosci. 2015 Apr 1;35(13):5202-12. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4434-14.2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Shared spectral fingerprints of temporal memory precision and representation of the temporal structure of complex narratives.
iScience. 2025 Mar 1;28(4):112132. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112132. eCollection 2025 Apr 18.
2
Pre-associative item encoding influences associative memory: Behavioral and ERP evidence.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2023 Aug;23(4):1059-1075. doi: 10.3758/s13415-023-01102-7. Epub 2023 May 11.
3
Informative and uninformative prestimulus cues at encoding benefit familiarity and source memory.
Memory. 2023 Mar;31(3):367-379. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2022.2156546. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
4
5
Effects of Age on Prestimulus Neural Activity Predictive of Successful Memory Encoding: An fMRI Study.
Cereb Cortex. 2021 Jan 5;31(2):917-932. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa265.
6
Comparison of fMRI correlates of successful episodic memory encoding in temporal lobe epilepsy patients and healthy controls.
Neuroimage. 2020 Feb 15;207:116397. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116397. Epub 2019 Nov 23.
7
Pre-retrieval event-related potentials predict source memory during task switching.
Neuroimage. 2019 Jul 1;194:174-181. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.03.038. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
8
Age-related Differences in Prestimulus Subsequent Memory Effects Assessed with Event-related Potentials.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Jun;30(6):829-850. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01249. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
9
Disrupted neural activity patterns to novelty and effort in young adult -e4 carriers performing a subsequent memory task.
Brain Behav. 2017 Jan 5;7(2):e00612. doi: 10.1002/brb3.612. eCollection 2017 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Pre-stimulus neural activity predicts successful encoding of inter-item associations.
Neuroimage. 2015 Jan 15;105:21-31. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.046. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
2
Effects of modality on the neural correlates of encoding processes supporting recollection and familiarity.
Learn Mem. 2011 Aug 18;18(9):565-73. doi: 10.1101/lm.2197211. Print 2011 Sep.
3
When the brain is prepared to learn: enhancing human learning using real-time fMRI.
Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 2;59(1):846-52. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.063. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
5
Neural activity that predicts subsequent memory and forgetting: a meta-analysis of 74 fMRI studies.
Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 1;54(3):2446-61. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.045. Epub 2010 Sep 30.
6
Prestimulus hippocampal activity predicts later recollection.
Hippocampus. 2010 Jan;20(1):24-8. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20663.
7
Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping.
Nat Neurosci. 2009 May;12(5):535-40. doi: 10.1038/nn.2303.
8
Posterior parietal cortex and episodic encoding: insights from fMRI subsequent memory effects and dual-attention theory.
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2009 Feb;91(2):139-54. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2008.10.011. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
10
Effects of study task on the neural correlates of source encoding.
Learn Mem. 2008 May 29;15(6):417-25. doi: 10.1101/lm.878908. Print 2008 Jun.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验