Loustalot Fabien, Kremer Eric J, Salinas Sara
Institut de Génétique Moléculaire de Montpellier, CNRS, Montpellier, France Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Institut de Génétique Moléculaire de Montpellier, CNRS, Montpellier, France Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
J Virol. 2015 Sep;89(18):9417-26. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01488-15. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
The coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor (CAR) is a cell adhesion molecule used as a docking molecule by some adenoviruses (AdVs) and group B coxsackieviruses. We previously proposed that the preferential transduction of neurons by canine adenovirus type 2 (CAV-2) is due to CAR-mediated internalization. Our proposed pathway of CAV-2 entry is in contrast to that of human AdV type 5 (HAdV-C5) in nonneuronal cells, where internalization is mediated by auxiliary receptors such as integrins. We therefore asked if in fibroblast-like cells the intracellular domain (ICD) of CAR plays a role in the internalization of the CAV-2 fiber knob (FK(CAV)), CAV-2, or HAdV-C5 when the capsid cannot engage integrins. Here, we show that in fibroblast-like cells, the CAR ICD is needed for FK(CAV) entry and efficient CAV-2 transduction but dispensable for HAdV-C5 and an HAdV-C5 capsid lacking the RGD sequence (an integrin-interacting motif) in the penton. Moreover, the deletion of the CAR ICD further impacts CAV-2 intracellular trafficking, highlighting the crucial role of CAR in CAV-2 intracellular dynamics. These data demonstrate that the CAR ICD contains sequences important for the recruitment of the endocytic machinery that differentially influences AdV cell entry.
Understanding how viruses interact with the host cell surface and reach the intracellular space is of crucial importance for applied and fundamental virology. Here, we compare the role of a cell adhesion molecule (CAR) in the internalization of adenoviruses that naturally infect humans and Canidae. We show that the intracellular domain of CAR differentially regulates AdV entry and trafficking. Our study highlights the mechanistic differences that a receptor can have for two viruses from the same family.
柯萨奇病毒和腺病毒受体(CAR)是一种细胞粘附分子,被一些腺病毒(AdV)和B组柯萨奇病毒用作对接分子。我们之前提出,犬2型腺病毒(CAV-2)对神经元的优先转导是由于CAR介导的内化作用。我们提出的CAV-2进入途径与人类5型腺病毒(HAdV-C5)在非神经元细胞中的途径相反,在非神经元细胞中,内化是由整合素等辅助受体介导的。因此,我们询问在成纤维细胞样细胞中,当衣壳无法与整合素结合时,CAR的细胞内结构域(ICD)是否在CAV-2纤维结(FK(CAV))、CAV-2或HAdV-C5的内化中发挥作用。在这里,我们表明,在成纤维细胞样细胞中,CAR ICD是FK(CAV)进入和高效CAV-2转导所必需的,但对于HAdV-C5和五邻体中缺乏RGD序列(一种整合素相互作用基序)的HAdV-C5衣壳则是可有可无的。此外,CAR ICD的缺失进一步影响CAV-2的细胞内运输,突出了CAR在CAV-2细胞内动态中的关键作用。这些数据表明,CAR ICD包含对募集内吞机制很重要的序列,该机制对腺病毒进入细胞有不同影响。
了解病毒如何与宿主细胞表面相互作用并进入细胞内空间对于应用病毒学和基础病毒学至关重要。在这里,我们比较了一种细胞粘附分子(CAR)在自然感染人类和犬科动物的腺病毒内化中的作用。我们表明,CAR的细胞内结构域对腺病毒的进入和运输有不同的调节作用。我们的研究突出了一种受体对同一家族的两种病毒可能存在的机制差异。