Division of Infectious Diseases, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania2Center for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Department of Infection Control and Prevention, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Sep;169(9):815-21. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0684.
When clinicians work with symptoms of infection, they can put patients and colleagues at risk. Little is known about the reasons why attending physicians and advanced practice clinicians (APCs) work while sick.
To identify a comprehensive understanding of the reasons why attending physicians and APCs work while sick.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We performed a mixed-methods analysis of a cross-sectional, anonymous survey administered from January 15 through March 20, 2014, in a large children's hospital in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Data were analyzed from April 1 through June 1, 2014. The survey was administered to 459 attending physicians and 470 APCs, including certified registered nurse practitioners, physician assistants, clinical nurse specialists, certified registered nurse anesthetists, and certified nurse midwives.
Self-reported frequency of working while experiencing symptoms of infection, perceived importance of various factors that encourage working while sick, and free-text comments written in response to open-ended questions.
Of those surveyed, we received responses from 280 attending physicians (61.0%) and 256 APCs (54.5%). Most of the respondents (504 [95.3%]) believed that working while sick put patients at risk. Despite this belief, 446 respondents (83.1%) reported working sick at least 1 time in the past year, and 50 (9.3%) reported working while sick at least 5 times. Respondents would work with significant symptoms, including diarrhea (161 [30.0%]), fever (86 [16.0%]), and acute onset of significant respiratory symptoms (299 [55.6%]). Physicians were more likely to report working with each of these symptoms than APCs (109 [38.9%] vs 51 [19.9%], 61 [21.8%] vs 25 [9.8%], and 168 [60.0%] vs 130 [50.8%], respectively [P < .05]). Reasons deemed important in deciding to work while sick included not wanting to let colleagues down (521 [98.7%]), staffing concerns (505 [94.9%]), not wanting to let patients down (494 [92.5%]), fear of ostracism by colleagues (342 [64.0%]), and concern about continuity of care (337 [63.8%]). Systematic qualitative analysis of free-text comments from 316 respondents revealed additional reasons why attending physicians and APCs work while sick, including extreme difficulty finding coverage (205 [64.9%]), a strong cultural norm to come to work unless remarkably ill (193 [61.1%]), and ambiguity about what constitutes "too sick to work" (180 [57.0%]).
Attending physicians and APCs frequently work while sick despite recognizing that this choice puts patients at risk. The decision to work sick is shaped by systems-level and sociocultural factors. Multimodal interventions are needed to reduce the frequency of this behavior.
当临床医生处理感染症状时,他们可能会使患者和同事面临风险。人们对为什么主治医生和高级执业医师(APCs)在生病时工作知之甚少。
确定主治医生和 APC 生病时工作的综合原因。
设计、地点和参与者:我们对 2014 年 1 月 15 日至 3 月 20 日在宾夕法尼亚州费城的一家大型儿童医院进行的横断面、匿名调查进行了混合方法分析。数据于 2014 年 4 月 1 日至 6 月 1 日进行分析。该调查针对 459 名主治医生和 470 名 APC 进行,包括注册护士执业师、医师助理、临床护理专家、注册麻醉师和注册护士助产士。
报告在出现感染症状时工作的频率、对各种鼓励生病时工作的因素的重要性的看法,以及对开放式问题的自由文本评论。
在接受调查的人中,我们收到了 280 名主治医生(61.0%)和 256 名 APC(54.5%)的回复。大多数受访者(504 [95.3%])认为生病时工作会使患者面临风险。尽管有这种信念,但 446 名受访者(83.1%)报告说在过去一年中至少有 1 次带病工作,50 名(9.3%)报告至少有 5 次带病工作。受访者会在出现严重症状时工作,包括腹泻(161 [30.0%])、发烧(86 [16.0%])和严重急性呼吸道症状(299 [55.6%])。医生比 APC 更有可能报告出现这些症状中的每一种(109 [38.9%]比 51 [19.9%],61 [21.8%]比 25 [9.8%],168 [60.0%]比 130 [50.8%],分别为 [P < .05])。决定带病工作的重要原因包括不想让同事失望(521 [98.7%])、人员配置问题(505 [94.9%])、不想让患者失望(494 [92.5%])、害怕被同事排斥(342 [64.0%])和担心护理连续性(337 [63.8%])。对 316 名受访者的自由文本评论进行系统的定性分析揭示了主治医生和 APC 带病工作的其他原因,包括极难找到替代人员(205 [64.9%])、除非病得很重否则来上班的强烈文化规范(193 [61.1%])以及对什么构成“病得太重不能工作”的模糊认识(180 [57.0%])。
尽管主治医生和 APC 承认这一选择会使患者面临风险,但他们仍经常在生病时工作。带病工作的决定是由系统层面和社会文化因素决定的。需要采取多模式干预措施来减少这种行为的频率。