Suppr超能文献

认知与安慰剂效应——区分主观感知与实际表现

Cognition and the Placebo Effect--Dissociating Subjective Perception and Actual Performance.

作者信息

Schwarz Katharina A, Büchel Christian

机构信息

Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Jul 6;10(7):e0130492. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130492. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

The influence of positive or negative expectations on clinical outcomes such as pain relief or motor performance in patients and healthy participants has been extensively investigated for years. Such research promises potential benefit for patient treatment by deliberately using expectations as means to stimulate endogenous regulation processes. Especially regarding recent interest and controversies revolving around cognitive enhancement, the question remains whether mere expectancies might also yield enhancing or impairing effects in the cognitive domain, i.e., can we improve or impair cognitive performance simply by creating a strong expectancy in participants about their performance? Moreover, previous literature suggests that especially subjective perception is highly susceptible to expectancy effects, whereas objective measures can be affected in certain domains, but not in others. Does such a dissociation of objective measures and subjective perception also apply to cognitive placebo and nocebo effects? In this study, we sought to investigate whether placebo and nocebo effects can be evoked in cognitive tasks, and whether these effects influence objective and subjective measures alike. To this end, we instructed participants about alleged effects of different tone frequencies (high, intermediate, low) on brain activity and cognitive functions. We paired each tone with specific success rates in a Flanker task paradigm as a preliminary conditioning procedure, adapted from research on placebo hypoalgesia. In a subsequent test phase, we measured reaction times and success rates in different expectancy conditions (placebo, nocebo, and control) and then asked participants how the different tone frequencies affected their performance. Interestingly, we found no effects of expectation on objective measures, but a strong effect on subjective perception, i.e., although actual performance was not affected by expectancy, participants strongly believed that the placebo tone frequency improved their performance.

摘要

多年来,积极或消极期望对患者及健康参与者的临床结果(如疼痛缓解或运动表现)的影响已得到广泛研究。此类研究有望通过有意将期望用作刺激内源性调节过程的手段,为患者治疗带来潜在益处。特别是鉴于近期围绕认知增强的兴趣和争议,问题仍然存在:仅仅是期望是否也可能在认知领域产生增强或损害作用,也就是说,我们能否仅仅通过让参与者对其表现产生强烈期望来提高或损害认知表现?此外,以往文献表明,尤其是主观感知极易受到期望效应的影响,而客观测量在某些领域可能会受到影响,但在其他领域则不然。这种客观测量与主观感知的分离是否也适用于认知安慰剂和反安慰剂效应?在本研究中,我们试图探究在认知任务中是否能诱发安慰剂和反安慰剂效应,以及这些效应是否同样影响客观和主观测量。为此,我们告知参与者不同音调频率(高、中、低)对大脑活动和认知功能的所谓影响。我们在一项侧翼任务范式中,将每个音调与特定成功率配对,作为初步的条件作用程序,该程序改编自安慰剂镇痛研究。在随后的测试阶段,我们测量了不同期望条件(安慰剂、反安慰剂和对照)下的反应时间和成功率,然后询问参与者不同音调频率如何影响他们的表现。有趣的是,我们发现期望对客观测量没有影响,但对主观感知有强烈影响,也就是说,尽管实际表现不受期望影响,但参与者坚信安慰剂音调频率提高了他们的表现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8779/4493024/06c6cd56bf43/pone.0130492.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Cognition and the Placebo Effect--Dissociating Subjective Perception and Actual Performance.
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 6;10(7):e0130492. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130492. eCollection 2015.
2
Can placebo or nocebo pills improve or impair cognition performance?
Hum Psychopharmacol. 2023 May;38(3):e2869. doi: 10.1002/hup.2869. Epub 2023 May 4.
3
Measuring expectation of pain: Contingent negative variation in placebo and nocebo effects.
Eur J Pain. 2017 May;21(5):874-885. doi: 10.1002/ejp.990. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
4
Objective and subjective cognitive enhancing effects of mixed amphetamine salts in healthy people.
Neuropharmacology. 2013 Jan;64:496-505. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.07.021. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
5
Distinct neural representations of placebo and nocebo effects.
Neuroimage. 2015 May 15;112:197-207. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.015. Epub 2015 Mar 14.
6
A comparison of placebo and nocebo effects on objective and subjective postural stability: a double-edged sword?
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Aug 18;16:967722. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.967722. eCollection 2022.
7
Mixed-amphetamine salts expectancies among college students: Is stimulant induced cognitive enhancement a placebo effect?
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Sep 1;178:302-309. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.05.024. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
8
Are there placebo or nocebo effects in balancing performance?
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 Apr 24;8(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00476-z.
9
Psychological Placebo and Nocebo Effects on Pain Rely on Expectation and Previous Experience.
J Pain. 2016 Feb;17(2):203-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.10.010. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
10
Evidence for Cognitive Placebo and Nocebo Effects in Healthy Individuals.
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 28;8(1):17443. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35124-w.

引用本文的文献

4
Placebo and nocebo interventions impact perceived but not actual proprioceptive accuracy.
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 30;19(8):e0307072. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307072. eCollection 2024.
6
Magnesium-ibogaine therapy in veterans with traumatic brain injuries.
Nat Med. 2024 Feb;30(2):373-381. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02705-w. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
7
Open-label placebo treatment does not enhance cognitive abilities in healthy volunteers.
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 9;13(1):19468. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45979-3.
8
Expectancy for Adderall influences subjective mood and drug effects regardless of concurrent caffeine ingestion: A randomized controlled trial.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2024 Jan;241(1):109-118. doi: 10.1007/s00213-023-06467-8. Epub 2023 Sep 23.
10
Are there placebo or nocebo effects in balancing performance?
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 Apr 24;8(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00476-z.

本文引用的文献

1
How Stereotypes Affect Pain.
Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 13;9(1):8626. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45044-y.
2
Welcome Back Theory!
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2014 Jan;9(1):72-5. doi: 10.1177/1745691613513472.
4
Avoiding nocebo effects to optimize treatment outcome.
JAMA. 2014 Aug 20;312(7):693-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.8342.
5
Hitting ability and perception of object's size: evidence for a negative relation.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Aug;76(6):1752-64. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0685-4.
6
Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.
Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Dec;1(4):476-90. doi: 10.3758/BF03210951.
7
Facilitation of pain in the human spinal cord by nocebo treatment.
J Neurosci. 2013 Aug 21;33(34):13784-90. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2191-13.2013.
8
Confidence intervals for two sample means: Calculation, interpretation, and a few simple rules.
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2013 Jun 17;9(2):74-80. doi: 10.2478/v10053-008-0133-x. Print 2013.
9
The placebo response in medicine: minimize, maximize or personalize?
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013 Mar;12(3):191-204. doi: 10.1038/nrd3923.
10
Learning, attentional control, and action video games.
Curr Biol. 2012 Mar 20;22(6):R197-206. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.012.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验