Schwarz Katharina A, Büchel Christian
Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 6;10(7):e0130492. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130492. eCollection 2015.
The influence of positive or negative expectations on clinical outcomes such as pain relief or motor performance in patients and healthy participants has been extensively investigated for years. Such research promises potential benefit for patient treatment by deliberately using expectations as means to stimulate endogenous regulation processes. Especially regarding recent interest and controversies revolving around cognitive enhancement, the question remains whether mere expectancies might also yield enhancing or impairing effects in the cognitive domain, i.e., can we improve or impair cognitive performance simply by creating a strong expectancy in participants about their performance? Moreover, previous literature suggests that especially subjective perception is highly susceptible to expectancy effects, whereas objective measures can be affected in certain domains, but not in others. Does such a dissociation of objective measures and subjective perception also apply to cognitive placebo and nocebo effects? In this study, we sought to investigate whether placebo and nocebo effects can be evoked in cognitive tasks, and whether these effects influence objective and subjective measures alike. To this end, we instructed participants about alleged effects of different tone frequencies (high, intermediate, low) on brain activity and cognitive functions. We paired each tone with specific success rates in a Flanker task paradigm as a preliminary conditioning procedure, adapted from research on placebo hypoalgesia. In a subsequent test phase, we measured reaction times and success rates in different expectancy conditions (placebo, nocebo, and control) and then asked participants how the different tone frequencies affected their performance. Interestingly, we found no effects of expectation on objective measures, but a strong effect on subjective perception, i.e., although actual performance was not affected by expectancy, participants strongly believed that the placebo tone frequency improved their performance.
多年来,积极或消极期望对患者及健康参与者的临床结果(如疼痛缓解或运动表现)的影响已得到广泛研究。此类研究有望通过有意将期望用作刺激内源性调节过程的手段,为患者治疗带来潜在益处。特别是鉴于近期围绕认知增强的兴趣和争议,问题仍然存在:仅仅是期望是否也可能在认知领域产生增强或损害作用,也就是说,我们能否仅仅通过让参与者对其表现产生强烈期望来提高或损害认知表现?此外,以往文献表明,尤其是主观感知极易受到期望效应的影响,而客观测量在某些领域可能会受到影响,但在其他领域则不然。这种客观测量与主观感知的分离是否也适用于认知安慰剂和反安慰剂效应?在本研究中,我们试图探究在认知任务中是否能诱发安慰剂和反安慰剂效应,以及这些效应是否同样影响客观和主观测量。为此,我们告知参与者不同音调频率(高、中、低)对大脑活动和认知功能的所谓影响。我们在一项侧翼任务范式中,将每个音调与特定成功率配对,作为初步的条件作用程序,该程序改编自安慰剂镇痛研究。在随后的测试阶段,我们测量了不同期望条件(安慰剂、反安慰剂和对照)下的反应时间和成功率,然后询问参与者不同音调频率如何影响他们的表现。有趣的是,我们发现期望对客观测量没有影响,但对主观感知有强烈影响,也就是说,尽管实际表现不受期望影响,但参与者坚信安慰剂音调频率提高了他们的表现。