Trinka Eugen, Leitinger Markus
Department of Neurology, Christian Doppler Klinik, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria; Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Salzburg, Austria.
Department of Neurology, Christian Doppler Klinik, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Epilepsy Behav. 2015 Aug;49:203-22. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.05.005. Epub 2015 Jul 4.
Nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is common in patients with coma with a prevalence between 5% and 48%. Patients in deep coma may exhibit epileptiform EEG patterns, such as generalized periodic spikes, and there is an ongoing debate about the relationship of these patterns and NCSE. The purposes of this review are (i) to discuss the various EEG patterns found in coma, its fluctuations, and transitions and (ii) to propose modified criteria for NCSE in coma. Classical coma patterns such as diffuse polymorphic delta activity, spindle coma, alpha/theta coma, low output voltage, or burst suppression do not reflect NCSE. Any ictal patterns with a typical spatiotemporal evolution or epileptiform discharges faster than 2.5 Hz in a comatose patient reflect nonconvulsive seizures or NCSE and should be treated. Generalized periodic diacharges or lateralized periodic discharges (GPDs/LPDs) with a frequency of less than 2.5 Hz or rhythmic discharges (RDs) faster than 0.5 Hz are the borderland of NCSE in coma. In these cases, at least one of the additional criteria is needed to diagnose NCSE (a) subtle clinical ictal phenomena, (b) typical spatiotemporal evolution, or (c) response to antiepileptic drug treatment. There is currently no consensus about how long these patterns must be present to qualify for NCSE, and the distinction from nonconvulsive seizures in patients with critical illness or in comatose patients seems arbitrary. The Salzburg Consensus Criteria for NCSE [1] have been modified according to the Standardized Terminology of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society [2] and validated in three different cohorts, with a sensitivity of 97.2%, a specificity of 95.9%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 96.3% in patients with clinical signs of NCSE. Their diagnostic utility in different cohorts with patients in deep coma has to be studied in the future. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Status Epilepticus".
非惊厥性癫痫持续状态(NCSE)在昏迷患者中很常见,患病率在5%至48%之间。深度昏迷患者可能会出现癫痫样脑电图模式,如全身性周期性棘波,关于这些模式与NCSE之间的关系存在持续的争论。本综述的目的是:(i)讨论昏迷中发现的各种脑电图模式、其波动和转变;(ii)提出昏迷中NCSE的修订标准。经典的昏迷模式,如弥漫性多形性δ活动、纺锤体昏迷、α/θ昏迷、低输出电压或爆发抑制,并不反映NCSE。昏迷患者中任何具有典型时空演变的发作模式或频率超过2.5 Hz的癫痫样放电反映非惊厥性发作或NCSE,应予以治疗。频率低于2.5 Hz的全身性周期性放电或局灶性周期性放电(GPDs/LPDs)或频率超过0.5 Hz的节律性放电(RDs)是昏迷中NCSE的临界状态。在这些情况下,诊断NCSE需要至少一项附加标准:(a)细微的临床发作现象;(b)典型的时空演变;或(c)对抗癫痫药物治疗的反应。目前对于这些模式必须出现多长时间才能符合NCSE的标准尚无共识,而且在危重病患者或昏迷患者中与非惊厥性发作的区分似乎是任意的。NCSE的萨尔茨堡共识标准[1]已根据美国临床神经生理学会的标准化术语[2]进行了修订,并在三个不同队列中得到验证,在有NCSE临床体征的患者中,敏感性为97.2%,特异性为95.9%,诊断准确性为96.3%。其在不同深度昏迷患者队列中的诊断效用有待未来研究。本文是名为“癫痫持续状态”的特刊的一部分。