• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者安全举措的效果如何?一项对患者安全随时间变化情况的回顾性患者记录审查研究。

How effective are patient safety initiatives? A retrospective patient record review study of changes to patient safety over time.

作者信息

Baines Rebecca, Langelaan Maaike, de Bruijne Martine, Spreeuwenberg Peter, Wagner Cordula

机构信息

NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, the Netherlands Dept. of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Sep;24(9):561-71. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003702. Epub 2015 Jul 6.

DOI:10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003702
PMID:26150548
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4552927/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether, compared with previous years, hospital care became safer in 2011/2012, expressing itself in a fall in preventable adverse event (AE) rates alongside patient safety initiatives.

DESIGN

Retrospective patient record review at three points in time.

SETTING

In three national AE studies, patient records of 2004, 2008 and 2011/2012 were reviewed in, respectively, 21 hospitals in 2004, 20 hospitals in 2008 and 20 hospitals in 2011/2012. In each hospital, 400, 200 and 200 patient records were sampled, respectively.

PARTICIPANTS

In total, 15 997 patient admissions were included in the study, 7926 patient admissions from 2004, 4023 from 2008 and 4048 from 2011/2012.

INTERVENTIONS

The main patient safety initiatives in hospital care at a national level between 2004 and 2012 have been small as well as large-scale multifaceted programmes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Rates of both AEs and preventable AEs.

RESULTS

Uncorrected crude overall AE rates showed no change in 2011/2012 in comparison with 2008, whereas preventable AE rates showed a reduction of 45%. After multilevel corrections, the decrease in preventable AE rate in 2011/2012 was still clearly visible with a decrease of 30% in comparison to 2008 (p=0.10). In 2011/2012, fewer preventable AEs were found in older age groups, or related to the surgical process, in comparison with 2008.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows some improvements in preventable AEs in the areas that were addressed during the comprehensive national safety programme. There are signs that such a programme has a positive impact on patient safety.

摘要

目的

评估与前几年相比,2011/2012年医院护理是否变得更安全,表现为可预防不良事件(AE)发生率下降以及患者安全举措。

设计

在三个时间点进行回顾性患者记录审查。

设置

在三项全国性AE研究中,分别对2004年的21家医院、2008年的20家医院和2011/2012年的20家医院中2004年、2008年和2011/2012年的患者记录进行审查。在每家医院中,分别抽取了400份、200份和200份患者记录。

参与者

该研究共纳入15997例患者入院病例,其中2004年7926例,2008年4023例,2011/2012年4048例。

干预措施

2004年至2012年期间,国家层面医院护理中的主要患者安全举措包括小型和大型多方面项目。

主要观察指标

AE和可预防AE的发生率。

结果

未经校正的总体AE粗率在2011/2012年与2008年相比无变化,而可预防AE率下降了45%。经过多水平校正后,2011/2012年可预防AE率的下降仍清晰可见,与2008年相比下降了30%(p = 0.10)。与2008年相比,2011/2012年在老年人群或与手术过程相关的可预防AE较少。

结论

我们的研究表明,在全国综合性安全计划所涉及的领域中,可预防AE有一些改善。有迹象表明,这样的计划对患者安全有积极影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d3c/4552927/90cdb05cc612/bmjqs-2014-003702f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d3c/4552927/a4f078d97c41/bmjqs-2014-003702f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d3c/4552927/06d1d80575f7/bmjqs-2014-003702f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d3c/4552927/90cdb05cc612/bmjqs-2014-003702f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d3c/4552927/a4f078d97c41/bmjqs-2014-003702f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d3c/4552927/06d1d80575f7/bmjqs-2014-003702f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d3c/4552927/90cdb05cc612/bmjqs-2014-003702f03.jpg

相似文献

1
How effective are patient safety initiatives? A retrospective patient record review study of changes to patient safety over time.患者安全举措的效果如何?一项对患者安全随时间变化情况的回顾性患者记录审查研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Sep;24(9):561-71. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003702. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
2
Adverse events and potentially preventable deaths in Dutch hospitals: results of a retrospective patient record review study.荷兰医院中的不良事件及潜在可预防死亡:一项回顾性患者病历审查研究的结果
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Aug;18(4):297-302. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.025924.
3
Is researching adverse events in hospital deaths a good way to describe patient safety in hospitals: a retrospective patient record review study.研究医院死亡中的不良事件是否是描述医院患者安全的好方法:一项回顾性患者记录审查研究。
BMJ Open. 2015 Jul 9;5(7):e007380. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007380.
4
Incidence of adverse events in Sweden during 2013-2016: a cohort study describing the implementation of a national trigger tool.2013 - 2016年瑞典不良事件的发生率:一项描述国家触发工具实施情况的队列研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 30;8(3):e020833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020833.
5
Changes in adverse event rates in hospitals over time: a longitudinal retrospective patient record review study.随着时间的推移,医院不良事件发生率的变化:一项纵向回顾性患者病历回顾研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Apr;22(4):290-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001126. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
6
Medication-related adverse events during hospitalization: a retrospective patient record review study in The Netherlands.住院期间与药物相关的不良事件:荷兰一项回顾性患者记录审查研究
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017 Jan;26(1):32-39. doi: 10.1002/pds.4037. Epub 2016 May 19.
7
Direct medical costs of adverse events in Dutch hospitals.荷兰医院不良事件的直接医疗费用。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Feb 9;9:27. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-27.
8
Design and reliability of a specific instrument to evaluate patient safety for patients with acute myocardial infarction treated in a predefined care track: a retrospective patient record review study in a single tertiary hospital in the Netherlands.一种用于评估在预定义护理路径下接受治疗的急性心肌梗死患者医疗安全的特定工具的设计与可靠性:荷兰一家三级医院的回顾性患者病历审查研究
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 20;7(3):e014360. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014360.
9
Excess length of stay and economic consequences of adverse events in Dutch hospital patients.荷兰医院患者的住院时间过长及不良事件的经济后果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec 1;15:531. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1205-5.
10
Adverse events in surgical patients in Australia.澳大利亚外科手术患者的不良事件。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2002 Aug;14(4):269-76. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/14.4.269.

引用本文的文献

1
The Safety Action Feedback and Engagement (SAFE) Loop: Initial Testing and Refinement of a Novel Intervention to Enhance Hospital Incident Reporting and Patient Safety.安全行动反馈与参与(SAFE)循环:一种增强医院事件报告和患者安全的新型干预措施的初步测试与完善
medRxiv. 2025 Jun 6:2025.06.03.25328744. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.03.25328744.
2
Hospital-acquired complications in critically ill patients.危重症患者的医院获得性并发症
Crit Care Resusc. 2023 Oct 18;23(3):285-291. doi: 10.51893/2021.3.OA5. eCollection 2021 Sep 6.
3
How is return on investment from quality improvement programmes conceptualised by mental healthcare leaders and why: a qualitative study.

本文引用的文献

1
Protocol compliance of administering parenteral medication in Dutch hospitals: an evaluation and cost estimation of the implementation.荷兰医院肠外给药的方案依从性:实施情况的评估与成本估算
BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 30;4(12):e005232. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005232.
2
Understanding factors that influence the use of risk scoring instruments in the management of patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the Netherlands: a qualitative study of health care practitioners' perceptions.了解影响荷兰不稳定型心绞痛或非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者管理中风险评分工具使用的因素:对医护人员认知的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 22;14:418. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-418.
3
精神卫生保健领导者如何从概念上理解改善项目的投资回报率,以及为什么要这样理解:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Sep 19;23(1):1009. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09911-9.
4
Patient safety culture in Austria and recommendations of evidence-based instruments for improving patient safety.奥地利的患者安全文化以及基于证据的改进患者安全的工具的建议。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 17;17(10):e0274805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274805. eCollection 2022.
5
Identifying and understanding benefits associated with return-on-investment from large-scale healthcare Quality Improvement programmes: an integrative systematic literature review.识别和理解与大型医疗保健质量改进计划投资回报率相关的收益:综合系统文献回顾。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 24;22(1):1083. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08171-3.
6
Hospital nurses' knowledge about older patients in Turkey: a validation and comparison study.土耳其医院护士对老年患者的认知:一项效度验证与比较研究。
BMC Nurs. 2022 May 10;21(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00882-6.
7
The Korea National Patient Safety Incidents Inquiry Survey: Feasibility of Medical Record Review for Detecting Adverse Events in Regional Public Hospitals.韩国国家患者安全事件查询调查:在地区公立医院通过病历审查检测不良事件的可行性。
J Patient Saf. 2022 Aug 1;18(5):389-395. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000964. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
8
Can using the functional resonance analysis method, as an intervention, improve patient safety in hospitals?: a stepped wedge design protocol.可否使用功能共振分析方法作为干预措施来提高医院患者安全性?一项阶梯式楔形设计方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Nov 13;21(1):1228. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07244-z.
9
Medical Specialists' Perspectives on the Influence of Electronic Medical Record Use on the Quality of Hospital Care: Semistructured Interview Study.医学专家对电子病历使用对医院护理质量影响的看法:半结构化访谈研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2021 Oct 27;8(4):e27671. doi: 10.2196/27671.
10
Incidence and preventability of adverse events in adult patients admitted to a Brazilian teaching hospital.巴西一所教学医院成年住院患者不良事件的发生率和可预防率。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 15;16(4):e0249531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249531. eCollection 2021.
Monitoring guideline adherence in the management of acute coronary syndrome in hospitals: design of a multicentre study.
监测医院急性冠状动脉综合征管理中的指南依从性:一项多中心研究的设计。
Neth Heart J. 2014 Aug;22(7-8):346-53. doi: 10.1007/s12471-014-0574-4.
4
Guideline adherence for identification and hydration of high-risk hospital patients for contrast-induced nephropathy.识别和水化高危住院患者对比剂肾病的指南遵循情况。
BMC Nephrol. 2014 Jan 6;15:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-15-2.
5
What impedes and what facilitates a quality improvement project for older hospitalized patients?哪些因素阻碍和促进了老年住院患者的质量改进项目?
Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Feb;26(1):41-8. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzt079. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
6
Clinicians are right not to like Cohen's κ.临床医生不喜欢 Cohen's κ 是对的。
BMJ. 2013 Apr 12;346:f2125. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2125.
7
Trends in adverse events over time: why are we not improving?不良事件随时间的趋势:为何我们没有进步?
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Apr;22(4):273-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-001935.
8
Changes in adverse event rates in hospitals over time: a longitudinal retrospective patient record review study.随着时间的推移,医院不良事件发生率的变化:一项纵向回顾性患者病历回顾研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Apr;22(4):290-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001126. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
9
The effect of a complementary e-learning course on implementation of a quality improvement project regarding care for elderly patients: a stepped wedge trial.补充电子学习课程对实施老年患者护理质量改进项目的效果:一项阶梯式试验。
Implement Sci. 2012 Mar 2;7:13. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-13.
10
A new frontier in patient safety.患者安全的新领域。
JAMA. 2011 Jun 1;305(21):2221-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.742.