Michael S. Sparer (
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Jul;34(7):1084-91. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0083.
Medicaid has grown exponentially since the mid-1980s, during both conservative Republican and liberal Democratic administrations. How has this happened? The answer is rooted in three political variables: interest groups, political culture, and American federalism. First, interest-group support (from hospitals, nursing homes, and insurers) is more influential than the fragmented group opposition (from underpaid office-based physicians). Second, Medicaid provides a partial counterweight to conservative charges of a federal health care takeover because of the states' roles in administering the program. Third, Medicaid's intergovernmental fiscal partnership creates financial incentives for state and federal officials to expand enrollment-expansions that these policy makers often favor, given the program's increasingly important role in the nation's health care system. This institutional dynamic is here called catalytic federalism.
自 20 世纪 80 年代中期以来,医疗补助计划呈指数级增长,无论是在保守的共和党政府还是自由的民主党政府时期都是如此。这是怎么发生的呢?答案根植于三个政治变量:利益集团、政治文化和美国联邦制。首先,利益集团的支持(来自医院、疗养院和保险公司)比零碎的团体反对(来自薪酬过低的以诊所为基础的医生)更有影响力。其次,由于各州在管理该计划方面的作用,医疗补助计划为保守派指责联邦政府接管医疗保健提供了部分制衡。第三,医疗补助计划的政府间财政伙伴关系为州和联邦官员创造了扩大参保人数的财政激励措施——鉴于该计划在国家医疗保健系统中的作用日益重要,这些政策制定者往往倾向于扩大参保人数。这种制度动态在这里被称为催化联邦制。