Meador Kimford J
From the Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Neurology. 2015 Sep 29;85(13):1171-6. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001818. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
Marked changes in US medical school funding began in the 1960s with progressively increasing revenues from clinical services. The growth of clinical revenues slowed in the mid-1990s, creating a funding crisis for US academic health care centers, who responded by having their faculty increase their clinical duties at the expense of research activities. Surveys document the resultant stresses on the academic clinician researcher. The NIH provides greater funding for basic and translational research than for clinical research, and the new Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute is inadequately funded to address the scope of needed clinical research. An increasing portion of clinical research is funded by industry, which leaves many important clinical issues unaddressed. There is an inadequate supply of skilled clinical researchers and a lack of external support for clinical research. The impact on the academic environment in university medical centers is especially severe on young faculty, who have a shrinking potential to achieve successful academic careers. National health care research funding policies should encourage the right balance of life-science investigations. Medical universities need to improve and highlight education on clinical research for students, residents, fellows, and young faculty. Medical universities also need to provide appropriate incentives for clinical research. Without training to ensure an adequate supply of skilled clinical researchers and a method to adequately fund clinical research, discoveries from basic and translational research cannot be clinically tested and affect patient care. Thus, many clinical problems will continue to be evaluated and treated with inadequate or even absent evidence-based knowledge.
美国医学院校资金状况的显著变化始于20世纪60年代,临床服务收入逐渐增加。20世纪90年代中期,临床收入增长放缓,给美国学术医疗中心带来了资金危机,这些中心的应对方式是让教职员工增加临床工作,以牺牲研究活动为代价。调查记录了由此给学术临床研究人员带来的压力。美国国立卫生研究院为基础研究和转化研究提供的资金比临床研究更多,新成立的以患者为中心的结果研究所在资金方面不足以应对所需临床研究的范围。越来越多的临床研究由行业资助,这使得许多重要的临床问题未得到解决。熟练临床研究人员的供应不足,临床研究缺乏外部支持。对大学医学中心学术环境的影响对年轻教职员工尤为严重,他们取得成功学术生涯的潜力正在缩小。国家医疗保健研究资金政策应鼓励生命科学研究的正确平衡。医科大学需要改进并突出对学生、住院医师、研究员和年轻教职员工的临床研究教育。医科大学还需要为临床研究提供适当的激励措施。如果没有培训以确保有足够数量的熟练临床研究人员,也没有为临床研究提供充足资金的方法,基础研究和转化研究的发现就无法进行临床测试,也无法影响患者护理。因此,许多临床问题将继续在缺乏充分甚至没有循证知识的情况下得到评估和治疗。