一项针对肩袖肌腱病的自我管理单一运动计划与常规物理治疗的对比:一项随机对照试验(SELF研究)

A self-managed single exercise programme versus usual physiotherapy treatment for rotator cuff tendinopathy: a randomised controlled trial (the SELF study).

作者信息

Littlewood Chris, Bateman Marcus, Brown Kim, Bury Julie, Mawson Sue, May Stephen, Walters Stephen J

机构信息

School of Health & Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

Derby Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Physiotherapy Department, London Road Community Hospital, Derby, UK.

出版信息

Clin Rehabil. 2016 Jul;30(7):686-96. doi: 10.1177/0269215515593784. Epub 2015 Jul 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a self-managed single exercise programme versus usual physiotherapy treatment for rotator cuff tendinopathy.

DESIGN

Multi-centre pragmatic unblinded parallel group randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

UK National Health Service.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with a clinical diagnosis of rotator cuff tendinopathy.

INTERVENTIONS

The intervention was a programme of self-managed exercise prescribed by a physiotherapist in relation to the most symptomatic shoulder movement. The control group received usual physiotherapy treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was the Shoulder Pain & Disability Index (SPADI) at three months. Secondary outcomes included the SPADI at six and twelve months.

RESULTS

A total of 86 patients (self-managed loaded exercise n=42; usual physiotherapy n=44) were randomised. Twenty-six patients were excluded from the analysis because of lack of primary outcome data at the 3 months follow-up, leaving 60 (n=27; n=33) patients for intention to treat analysis. For the primary outcome, the mean SPADI score at three months was 32.4 (SD 20.2) for the self-managed group, and 30.7 (SD 19.7) for the usual physiotherapy treatment group; mean difference adjusted for baseline score: 3.2 (95% Confidence interval -6.0 to +12.4 P = 0.49).By six and twelve months there remained no significant difference between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study does not provide sufficient evidence of superiority of one intervention over the other in the short-, mid- or long-term and hence a self-management programme based around a single exercise appears comparable to usual physiotherapy treatment.

摘要

目的

评估自我管理的单一运动方案与常规物理治疗对肩袖肌腱病的临床疗效。

设计

多中心实用非盲平行组随机对照试验。

地点

英国国家医疗服务体系。

参与者

临床诊断为肩袖肌腱病的患者。

干预措施

干预措施是由物理治疗师根据最疼痛的肩部运动开具的自我管理运动方案。对照组接受常规物理治疗。

主要结局指标

主要结局指标是三个月时的肩痛与功能障碍指数(SPADI)。次要结局指标包括六个月和十二个月时的SPADI。

结果

共有86例患者(自我管理负荷运动组n = 42;常规物理治疗组n = 44)被随机分组。26例患者因在3个月随访时缺乏主要结局数据而被排除在分析之外,剩余60例(n = 27;n = 33)患者进行意向性分析。对于主要结局,自我管理组三个月时的平均SPADI评分为32.4(标准差20.2),常规物理治疗组为30.7(标准差19.7);根据基线评分调整后的平均差异为:3.2(95%置信区间-6.0至+12.4,P = 0.49)。到六个月和十二个月时,两组之间仍无显著差异。

结论

本研究未提供足够证据表明在短期、中期或长期内一种干预措施优于另一种干预措施,因此基于单一运动的自我管理方案似乎与常规物理治疗相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索