Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Lymphat Res Biol. 2022 Apr;20(2):191-202. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2020.0125. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
Compression therapy is an important part of the treatment of patients with lymphedema or chronic venous disease. However, there is no validated questionnaire evaluating the effect of compression and its acceptance by the patient. Therefore, the aims of this study were to construct a questionnaire evaluating the effect of compression and its acceptance by the patient, that is, the Dutch ICC Compression Questionnaire (ICC-CQ), to investigate its reliability and validity, and to translate it into English. Eleven experts in applying compression and 51 Dutch patients with experience of using compression were involved in the construction process. One part of the ICC-CQ has to be completed by the patient and evaluates seven domains. The other part has to be completed by the health care provider and comprises three domains. Reliability and validity of the final version was investigated in a new group of 79 Dutch-speaking patients with lymphedema or chronic venous disease, wearing compression garments ( = 52) or bandages ( = 27). Except for one domain, the Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for test-rest/interrater reliability ranged from 0.55 to 0.93. Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency ranged from 0.71 to 0.97. Eighty-nine percent of the patients fully understood the questionnaire indicating good face validity, and 87% found it complete indicating good content validity. Construct validity was considered good since 10 out of 11 hypotheses were accepted. The ICC-CQ is the first reliable and valid questionnaire evaluating different kinds of compression and the experience by patients with lymphedema or chronic venous disease.
压缩疗法是治疗淋巴水肿或慢性静脉疾病患者的重要组成部分。然而,目前尚无经过验证的问卷来评估压缩的效果及其在患者中的接受程度。因此,本研究的目的是构建一种评估压缩效果及其在患者中的接受程度的问卷,即荷兰 ICC 压缩问卷(ICC-CQ),并对其进行信度和效度的调查,同时将其翻译成英文。11 名在应用压缩方面的专家和 51 名有过压缩使用经验的荷兰患者参与了构建过程。ICC-CQ 的一部分需要由患者填写,评估七个领域。另一部分需要由医疗保健提供者填写,包括三个领域。在一个新的由 79 名讲荷兰语的淋巴水肿或慢性静脉疾病患者组成的群体中(穿压缩衣的患者=52 名,绷带的患者=27 名),对最终版本的信度和效度进行了调查。除了一个领域外,测试-重测/评价者间的内类相关系数的可靠性范围从 0.55 到 0.93。内部一致性的 Cronbach's alpha 范围从 0.71 到 0.97。89%的患者完全理解问卷,表明良好的表面效度,87%的患者认为问卷完整,表明良好的内容效度。由于 11 个假设中有 10 个被接受,因此结构效度被认为是良好的。ICC-CQ 是第一个评估不同类型的压缩和淋巴水肿或慢性静脉疾病患者体验的可靠和有效的问卷。