Impact of Side Branch Modeling on Computation of Endothelial Shear Stress in Coronary Artery Disease: Coronary Tree Reconstruction by Fusion of 3D Angiography and OCT.

BACKGROUND

Computational fluid dynamics allow virtual evaluation of coronary physiology and shear stress (SS). Most studies hitherto assumed the vessel as a single conduit without accounting for the flow through side branches.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to develop a new approach to reconstruct coronary geometry that also computes outgoing flow through side branches in hemodynamic and biomechanical calculations, using fusion of optical coherence tomography (OCT) and 3-dimensional (3D) angiography.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients enrolled in the DOCTOR (Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Revascularization) fusion study underwent OCT and 3D-angiography of the target vessel (9 left anterior descending, 2 left circumflex, 10 right coronary artery). Coronary 3D reconstruction was performed by fusion of OCT and angiography, creating a true anatomical tree model (TM) including the side branches, and a traditional single-conduit model (SCM) disregarding the side branches.

RESULTS

The distal coronary pressure to aortic pressure (Pd/Pa) ratio was significantly higher in TMs than in SCMs (0.904 vs. 0.842; p < 0.0001). Agreement between TM and SCM in identifying patients with a Pd/Pa ratio ≤0.80 under basal flow conditions was only k = 0.417 (p = 0.019). Average SS was 4.64 Pascal lower in TMs than in SCMs (p < 0.0001), with marked differences in the point-per-point comparison, ranging from -60.71 to 7.47 Pascal.

CONCLUSIONS

True anatomical TMs that take into account the flow through side branches are feasible for accurate hemodynamic and biomechanical calculations. Traditional SCMs underestimate Pd/Pa and are inaccurate for regional SS estimation. Implementation of TMs might improve the accuracy of SS and virtual fractional flow reserve calculations, thus improving the consistency of biomechanical studies.