Hunleth Jean M, Steinmetz Emily K, McQueen Amy, James Aimee S
Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
Antioch College, Yellow Springs, Ohio, USA.
Qual Health Res. 2016 Jan;26(1):17-31. doi: 10.1177/1049732315593549. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
Dominant health care professional discourses on cancer take for granted high levels of individual responsibility in cancer prevention, especially in expectations about preventive screening. At the same time, adhering to screening guidelines can be difficult for lower income and under-insured individuals. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a prime example. Since the advent of CRC screening, disparities in CRC mortality have widened along lines of income, insurance, and race in the United States. We used a community-engaged research method, Photovoice, to examine how people from medically under-served areas experienced and gave meaning to CRC screening. In our analysis, we first discuss ways in which participants recounted screening as a struggle. Second, we highlight a category that participants suggested was key to successful screening: social connections. Finally, we identify screening as an emotionally laden process that is underpinned by feelings of uncertainty, guilt, fear, and relief. We discuss the importance of these findings to research and practice.
医疗保健专业人士关于癌症的主流论述认为,个人在癌症预防方面承担着很高的责任,尤其是在预防性筛查的期望方面。与此同时,对于低收入和未参保的个人来说,遵守筛查指南可能会很困难。结直肠癌(CRC)就是一个典型例子。自结直肠癌筛查出现以来,美国结直肠癌死亡率的差距沿着收入、保险和种族的界限不断扩大。我们采用了一种社区参与式研究方法——摄影声音法,来研究来自医疗服务不足地区的人们如何体验结直肠癌筛查并赋予其意义。在我们的分析中,我们首先讨论参与者将筛查描述为一种挣扎的方式。其次,我们强调参与者认为对成功筛查至关重要的一个类别:社会关系。最后,我们将筛查确定为一个充满情感的过程,其基础是不确定感、内疚感、恐惧感和解脱感。我们讨论了这些发现对研究和实践的重要性。