Waters Erika A, Pachur Thorsten, Pogge Gabrielle, Hunleth Jean, Webster Gregory D, Fedele David A, Shepperd James A
Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
Psychol Health. 2025 Apr;40(4):571-593. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2023.2244522. Epub 2023 Aug 6.
Parents and guardians (hereafter ) make decisions for their children's medical care. However, many caregivers of children with asthma struggle to understand their child's illness. We used the psychometric paradigm to investigate how caregivers conceptualize, or , asthma triggers and symptoms and how these representations are linked to perceived asthma exacerbation risk.
We asked 377 caregivers of children with asthma across the U.S. to rate 20 triggers or 20 symptoms along 15 characteristics. Caregivers also indicated their perceived risk of their child having an asthma exacerbation (hereafter ). Using principal components analysis, we extracted key dimensions underlying caregivers' ratings on the characteristics. Then we related the triggers' and symptoms' scores on the dimensions to caregivers' interpersonal risk perceptions.
Interpersonal risk perceptions were higher for triggers with high ratings for the dimensions and , but not . Risk perceptions were also higher for symptoms with high ratings for the dimensions , and , but not or .
By identifying key dimensions underlying caregivers' mental representations of asthma triggers and symptoms, these findings can inform a new approach to asthma education.
父母和监护人(以下简称“监护人”)为其子女的医疗护理做出决策。然而,许多哮喘患儿的照料者难以理解孩子的病情。我们采用心理测量范式来研究照料者如何概念化,即理解,哮喘触发因素和症状,以及这些表征如何与感知到的哮喘加重风险相关联。
我们让美国各地377名哮喘患儿的照料者根据15个特征对20种触发因素或20种症状进行评分。照料者还表明了他们对孩子哮喘加重(以下简称“加重”)的感知风险。通过主成分分析,我们提取了照料者在这些特征评分背后的关键维度。然后,我们将触发因素和症状在这些维度上的得分与照料者的人际风险感知联系起来。
对于在“[维度1]”和“[维度2]”维度上评分较高的触发因素,人际风险感知较高,但在“[维度3]”维度上并非如此。对于在“[维度4]”、“[维度5]”和“[维度6]”维度上评分较高的症状,风险感知也较高,但在“[维度7]”或“[维度8]”维度上并非如此。
通过确定照料者对哮喘触发因素和症状心理表征背后的关键维度,这些发现可为哮喘教育的新方法提供依据。