Flores-Castillo D, Martínez-Rider R, Ruiz-Rodríguez S, Garrocho-Rangel A, Lara-Guevara J, Pozos-Guillén A
From the Facultad de Estomatología, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, Mexico.
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015 Summer;39(4):382-6. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-39.4.382.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of subcutaneous (SC) sedation using midazolam with and without ketamine in non-cooperative pediatric patients undergoing dental treatment.
A prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, crossover pilot clinical trial was carried out in 13 children, aged between 17-46 months, ASA l, Frankl 1. Two sedation schemes were administered SC: Midazolam alone (M), and a combination of Midazolam-Ketamine (MK). Both regimens were administered to the same patient in two consecutive treatment sessions, in accordance with a random assignment. Overall behavior, movement, and crying were assessed according to the modified Houpt scale. Heart rate, blood pressure, blood oxygen saturation, and possible side effects were also monitored.
The percentage of non-crying children was always higher in the treatment with MK compared with the treatment with M, but without a significant statistical difference. Regarding variable body movement, the percentage of children without movement was higher in the MK group, although only up to minute 10; no significant differences were found at 20, 30, and 40 minutes, and from minute 40, body movement was lower in the M group.
Midazolam alone and the midazolam-ketamine combination administered subcutaneously resulted in a safe and efficient pharmacological method for providing moderate sedation to non-cooperative pediatric patients undergoing dental treatment.
本研究的目的是评估在接受牙科治疗的不合作儿科患者中,使用咪达唑仑单独或联合氯胺酮进行皮下镇静的疗效。
对13名年龄在17 - 46个月、ASA Ⅰ级、Frankl Ⅰ级的儿童进行了一项前瞻性、随机、对照、双盲、交叉试点临床试验。采用皮下注射两种镇静方案:单独使用咪达唑仑(M),以及咪达唑仑 - 氯胺酮联合使用(MK)。根据随机分配,两种方案在两个连续的治疗疗程中给予同一名患者。根据改良的豪普特量表评估总体行为、动作和哭闹情况。还监测心率、血压、血氧饱和度以及可能的副作用。
与使用M治疗相比,MK治疗中不哭儿童的百分比始终更高,但无显著统计学差异。关于身体动作变量,MK组中无动作儿童的百分比更高,尽管仅在第10分钟之前如此;在20、30和40分钟时未发现显著差异,且从第40分钟起,M组的身体动作较少。
单独使用咪达唑仑以及皮下注射咪达唑仑 - 氯胺酮联合使用,为接受牙科治疗的不合作儿科患者提供中度镇静是一种安全有效的药理学方法。