• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

观察量表如何关联小儿程序性镇静期间儿童行为的评分?

How Do Observational Scales Correlate the Ratings of Children's Behavior during Pediatric Procedural Sedation?

作者信息

Moura Larissa da Silva, Costa Paulo Sucasas, Costa Luciane Rezende

机构信息

Health Sciences Graduate Program, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Goiânia, GO, Brazil.

Faculty of Medicine, UFG, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:5248271. doi: 10.1155/2016/5248271. Epub 2016 Dec 28.

DOI:10.1155/2016/5248271
PMID:28116299
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5225321/
Abstract

. There is little information regarding the ability of observational scales to properly assess children's behavior during procedural sedation. . To evaluate the characteristics of the Houpt scales, the Ohio State University Behavioral Rating Scale (OSUBRS) and the Venham Behavior Rating Scale when applied to preschool children undergoing conscious dental sedation. . This study included 27 children, 4-6 years old with early childhood caries that participated in a clinical trial (NCT02284204) that investigated two sedative regimes using oral midazolam/ketamine. Dental appointments were video-recorded; five calibrated observers assessed 1,209 minutes of video recording to score the children's behavior, following the instructions of the investigated scales. Data were analyzed by descriptive analysis and Spearman correlation tests ( < 0.05). . The Houpt overall behavior and the Venham scale were highly correlated (rho = -0.87; < 0.001). OSUBRS scores were better correlated with Houpt overall behavior and Venham ratings, when compared to Houpt scores in the categories for movement and crying. . The Houpt overall behavior and the Venham scores are global scales that properly measure children's behavior during dental sedation. Continuous assessment with OSUBRS through videos has a chance to give more precise data, while the Houpt categories can easily demonstrate children's behavior during procedures.

摘要

关于观察量表在程序性镇静期间正确评估儿童行为能力的信息很少。为了评估霍普特量表、俄亥俄州立大学行为评定量表(OSUBRS)和维纳姆行为评定量表应用于接受清醒牙科镇静的学龄前儿童时的特征。本研究纳入了27名4至6岁患有幼儿龋齿的儿童,他们参与了一项临床试验(NCT02284204),该试验研究了两种使用口服咪达唑仑/氯胺酮的镇静方案。牙科预约过程进行了视频记录;五名经过校准的观察者按照所研究量表的指示,对1209分钟的视频记录进行评估,以对儿童的行为进行评分。通过描述性分析和斯皮尔曼相关性检验(<0.05)对数据进行分析。霍普特总体行为量表和维纳姆量表高度相关(rho = -0.87;<0.001)。与霍普特量表在运动和哭泣类别中的得分相比,OSUBRS得分与霍普特总体行为和维纳姆评分的相关性更好。霍普特总体行为量表和维纳姆得分是在牙科镇静期间正确测量儿童行为的整体量表。通过视频使用OSUBRS进行连续评估有机会提供更精确的数据,而霍普特类别可以轻松展示儿童在操作过程中的行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2552/5225321/d5c665fa3bf5/BMRI2016-5248271.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2552/5225321/fdfcb009e281/BMRI2016-5248271.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2552/5225321/d5c665fa3bf5/BMRI2016-5248271.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2552/5225321/fdfcb009e281/BMRI2016-5248271.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2552/5225321/d5c665fa3bf5/BMRI2016-5248271.002.jpg

相似文献

1
How Do Observational Scales Correlate the Ratings of Children's Behavior during Pediatric Procedural Sedation?观察量表如何关联小儿程序性镇静期间儿童行为的评分?
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:5248271. doi: 10.1155/2016/5248271. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
2
Combined oral midazolam-ketamine better than midazolam alone for sedation of young children: a randomized controlled trial.咪达唑仑-氯胺酮联合口服镇静优于咪达唑仑单独用于幼儿镇静:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2013 May;23(3):207-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2012.01246.x. Epub 2012 May 28.
3
Moderate sedation helps improve future behavior in pediatric dental patients - a prospective study.中度镇静有助于改善儿科牙科患者未来的行为——一项前瞻性研究。
Braz Oral Res. 2016 Oct 24;30(1):e107. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0107.
4
Does sevoflurane add to outpatient procedural sedation in children? A randomised clinical trial.七氟醚是否能增强儿童门诊手术镇静效果?一项随机临床试验。
BMC Pediatr. 2017 Mar 24;17(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0838-4.
5
Assessment of buccal aerosolized midazolam for pediatric conscious sedation.用于小儿清醒镇静的口腔雾化咪达唑仑评估。
J Investig Clin Dent. 2015 Feb;6(1):40-4. doi: 10.1111/jicd.12062. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
6
Subcutaneous Midazolam with and without Ketamine for Sedation In Children Undergoing Dental Treatment: A Pilot Study.用于牙科治疗儿童镇静的皮下注射咪达唑仑联合或不联合氯胺酮:一项初步研究。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015 Summer;39(4):382-6. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-39.4.382.
7
Oral midazolam reduces cortisol levels during local anaesthesia in children: a randomised controlled trial.口服咪达唑仑可降低儿童局部麻醉期间的皮质醇水平:一项随机对照试验。
Braz Oral Res. 2015;29(1):S1806-83242015000100305. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2015.vol29.0125. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
8
Comparison of oral midazolam with a combination of oral midazolam and nitrous oxide-oxygen inhalation in the effectiveness of dental sedation for young children.口服咪达唑仑与口服咪达唑仑联合一氧化二氮-氧气吸入用于幼儿牙科镇静效果的比较。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2009 Jan-Mar;27(1):9-16. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.50810.
9
Comparison of oral midazolam and triclofos in conscious sedation of uncooperative children.口服咪达唑仑与三氯福司用于不合作儿童清醒镇静的比较。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011 Winter;36(2):189-96. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.36.2.0346178414pvw865.
10
Randomized clinical trial on the efficacy of intranasal or oral ketamine-midazolam combinations compared to oral midazolam for outpatient pediatric sedation.鼻内或口服氯胺酮-咪达唑仑联合用药与口服咪达唑仑用于门诊儿科镇静的随机临床试验比较。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 11;14(3):e0213074. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213074. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Buccal Midazolam in Comparison With Intranasal Midazolam Sedation in Uncooperative Children During Dental Treatment.比较口腔咪达唑仑与鼻内咪达唑仑在牙科治疗中对不合作儿童镇静效果的评估。
Int J Dent. 2025 Mar 17;2025:4269519. doi: 10.1155/ijod/4269519. eCollection 2025.
2
Effectiveness and predictive factors of nitrous oxide and oxygen inhalation sedation for paediatric dental procedures: a retrospective cohort study of Thai children.笑气与氧气吸入镇静用于儿科牙科治疗的有效性及预测因素:泰国儿童的一项回顾性队列研究
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2025 Mar 3. doi: 10.1007/s40368-025-01013-w.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of dexmedetomidine and midazolam-ketamine combination as sedative agents in pediatric dentistry: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial.右美托咪定与咪达唑仑 - 氯胺酮联合用药作为儿科牙科镇静剂的比较评价:一项双盲随机对照试验。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2016 Apr-Jun;7(2):186-92. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.183058.
2
Subcutaneous Midazolam with and without Ketamine for Sedation In Children Undergoing Dental Treatment: A Pilot Study.用于牙科治疗儿童镇静的皮下注射咪达唑仑联合或不联合氯胺酮:一项初步研究。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015 Summer;39(4):382-6. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-39.4.382.
3
Two Oral Midazolam Preparations in Pediatric Dental Patients: A Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial.
Parents' satisfaction and children's acceptance of nasal compared to oral midazolam for sedation in two consecutive pediatric dental treatments: a randomized controlled study.
在连续两次儿科牙科治疗中,比较鼻内与口服咪达唑仑镇静效果时父母的满意度及儿童的接受度:一项随机对照研究。
Front Dent Med. 2023 Dec 21;4:1296823. doi: 10.3389/fdmed.2023.1296823. eCollection 2023.
4
Equimolar oxygen-nitrous oxide (EMONO) in dental pediatric care: which patients achieve therapeutic effects? A French national exploratory prospective observational multicenter study.牙科儿科护理中使用等摩尔氧-氧化亚氮(EMONO):哪些患者能获得治疗效果?一项法国全国性探索性前瞻性观察性多中心研究。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2025 Feb;26(1):149-158. doi: 10.1007/s40368-024-00950-2. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
5
A software-based observational coding approach for evaluating paediatric dental pain, anxiety, and fear.一种基于软件的观察性编码方法,用于评估儿童牙科疼痛、焦虑和恐惧。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2025 Mar;35(2):241-258. doi: 10.1111/ipd.13227. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
6
Efficacy of continuous intravenous remimazolam versus midazolam in the extraction of impacted wisdom teeth: protocol of a randomised controlled trial.持续静脉注射雷米唑仑与咪达唑仑在拔除阻生智齿中的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 25;13(4):e067908. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067908.
7
Behavioral Modifications in Children after Repeated Sedation with Nitrous Oxide for Dental Treatment: A Retrospective Study.反复吸入笑气镇静后儿童行为改变的回顾性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 24;20(5):4037. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054037.
8
Sedation versus protective stabilization for dental treatment of children with caries and challenging behavior at the dentist (CHOOSE): a study protocol for a non-randomized clinical trial.镇静与保护性稳定在龋齿和行为问题儿童牙科治疗中的应用比较(CHOOSE):一项非随机临床试验研究方案。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 May 12;21(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01594-0.
9
Comparison of the Efficacy of Jilo Animation Approach versus Conventional Tell-Show-Do (TSD) Technique on Cooperation and Anxiety Levels of Children during Dental Practice: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials.吉洛动画方法与传统示范-展示-操作(TSD)技术对儿童牙科治疗中合作程度和焦虑水平影响的疗效比较:一项随机对照临床试验
J Dent (Shiraz). 2020 Dec;21(4):284-291. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2020.81897.1001.
10
Randomized clinical trial on the efficacy of intranasal or oral ketamine-midazolam combinations compared to oral midazolam for outpatient pediatric sedation.鼻内或口服氯胺酮-咪达唑仑联合用药与口服咪达唑仑用于门诊儿科镇静的随机临床试验比较。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 11;14(3):e0213074. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213074. eCollection 2019.
两种口服咪达唑仑制剂用于儿童牙科患者:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。
Int J Pediatr. 2015;2015:349795. doi: 10.1155/2015/349795. Epub 2015 May 20.
4
A comparative evaluation of intranasal dexmedetomidine, midazolam and ketamine for their sedative and analgesic properties: a triple blind randomized study.鼻内给予右美托咪定、咪达唑仑和氯胺酮镇静镇痛特性的比较评估:一项三盲随机研究。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014 Spring;38(3):255-61. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.38.3.l828585807482966.
5
Sedative Effect of Oral Midazolam/Hydroxyzine versus Chloral Hydrate/Hydroxyzine on 2-6 Year-Old Uncooperative Dental Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.口服咪达唑仑/羟嗪与水合氯醛/羟嗪对2至6岁不合作牙科患者的镇静效果:一项随机临床试验。
J Dent (Tehran). 2014 Jan;11(1):93-9. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
6
Buccal midazolam spray as an alternative to intranasal route for conscious sedation in pediatric dentistry.口腔咪达唑仑喷雾剂作为儿科牙科清醒镇静鼻内途径的替代方法。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013 Winter;38(2):171-3. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.38.2.n055763721297702.
7
Efficacy and safety of midazolam for sedation in pediatric dentistry: a controlled clinical trial.咪达唑仑用于儿童牙科镇静的疗效与安全性:一项对照临床试验。
J Dent Child (Chic). 2013 Sep-Dec;80(3):133-8.
8
Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.鼻腔内给予右美托咪定与咪达唑仑用于接受全口牙齿修复的儿童术前用药:一项双盲随机对照试验。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2014 Feb;24(2):181-9. doi: 10.1111/pan.12287. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
9
A double blind randomized trial of ketofol versus propofol for endodontic treatment of anxious pediatric patients.酮咯酸氨丁三醇与丙泊酚用于焦虑儿童患者牙髓治疗的双盲随机试验。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013 Summer;37(4):415-20. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.37.4.thv8372410714342.
10
Assessing the sedative effect of oral vs submucosal meperidine in pediatric dental patients.评估口服与黏膜下注射哌替啶对小儿牙科患者的镇静效果。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2013 Mar;10(2):173-9. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.113335.