Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2010 Mar;5(2):182-4. doi: 10.1177/1745691610362352. Epub 2010 Mar 30.
Narvaez (2010, this issue) calls for a moral psychology in which reasoning and intuitions are equal partners. But empirical research on the power of implicit processes and on the weakness of everyday reasoning indicates that the partnership is far from equal. The ancient rationalist faith that good reasoning can be taught and that it will lead to improved behavior is no longer justified. The social intuitionist model (Haidt, 2001) is a more realistic portrayal of the ways that moral intuition and reasoning work together.
纳瓦埃兹(2010 年,本期)呼吁建立一种道德心理学,在这种心理学中,推理和直觉是平等的伙伴。但关于内隐过程的力量和日常推理的弱点的实证研究表明,这种伙伴关系远不平等。良好的推理可以被教导并将导致行为改善的古老理性主义信念不再有充分依据。社会直觉主义模型(Haidt,2001)更真实地描绘了道德直觉和推理共同作用的方式。