Pizarro David A, Bloom Paul
Department of Psychology, Yale University, USA.
Psychol Rev. 2003 Jan;110(1):193-6; discussion 197-8. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.110.1.193.
The social intuitionist model (J. Haidt, 2001) posits that fast and automatic intuitions are the primary source of moral judgments. Conscious deliberations play little causal role; they are used mostly to construct post hoc justifications for judgments that have already occurred. In this article, the authors present evidence that fast and automatic moral intuitions are actually shaped and informed by prior reasoning. More generally, there is considerable evidence from outside the laboratory that people actively engage in reasoning when faced with real-world moral dilemmas. Together, these facts limit the strong claims of the social intuitionist model concerning the irrelevance of conscious deliberation.
社会直觉主义模型(J. 海德特,2001)认为,快速且自动的直觉是道德判断的主要来源。有意识的思考几乎不发挥因果作用;它们大多被用于为已经做出的判断构建事后的正当理由。在本文中,作者提出证据表明,快速且自动的道德直觉实际上是由先前的推理塑造并受到其影响的。更普遍地说,来自实验室之外的大量证据表明,人们在面对现实世界的道德困境时会积极地进行推理。这些事实共同限制了社会直觉主义模型关于有意识思考无关紧要的强硬主张。