Redman Aaron D, Parkerton Thomas F
ExxonMobil Biomedical Sciences, Inc., 1545 US Highway 22 East, Annandale, NJ 08801, USA.
ExxonMobil Biomedical Sciences, Inc., 22777 Springwood Village Parkway, Spring, TX 77339, USA.
Mar Pollut Bull. 2015 Sep 15;98(1-2):156-70. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.06.053. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
The complex nature and limited aqueous solubility of petroleum substances pose challenges for consistently characterizing exposures in aquatic life hazard assessments. This paper reviews important considerations for the design, conduct and interpretation of laboratory toxicity tests with physically and chemically dispersed oils based on an understanding of the behavior and toxicity of the hydrocarbons that comprise these substances. Guiding principles are provided that emphasize the critical need to understand and, when possible, characterize dissolved hydrocarbon exposures that dictate observed toxicity in these tests. These principles provide a consistent framework for interpreting toxicity studies performed using different substances and test methods by allowing varying dissolved exposures to be expressed in terms of a common metric based on toxic units (TUs). The use of passive sampling methods is also advocated since such analyses provide an analytical surrogate for TUs. The proposed guidance is translated into a series of questions that can be used in evaluating existing data and in guiding design of future studies. Application of these questions to a number of recent publications indicates such considerations are often ignored, thus perpetuating the difficulty of interpreting and comparing results between studies and limiting data use in objective hazard assessment. Greater attention to these principles will increase the comparability and utility of oil toxicity data in decision-making.
石油物质的复杂性质和有限的水溶性给水生生物危害评估中持续表征暴露情况带来了挑战。本文基于对构成这些物质的碳氢化合物的行为和毒性的理解,回顾了使用物理和化学分散油进行实验室毒性试验的设计、实施和解释的重要考虑因素。提供了指导原则,强调了理解并在可能的情况下表征溶解碳氢化合物暴露的关键需求,这些暴露决定了这些试验中观察到的毒性。这些原则提供了一个一致的框架,通过允许根据毒性单位(TUs)以通用指标表示不同的溶解暴露量,来解释使用不同物质和试验方法进行的毒性研究。还提倡使用被动采样方法,因为此类分析可提供毒性单位的分析替代指标。所提出的指导原则转化为一系列问题,可用于评估现有数据和指导未来研究的设计。将这些问题应用于近期的一些出版物表明,此类考虑因素常常被忽视,从而使得解释和比较研究结果变得困难,并限制了在客观危害评估中数据的使用。更加关注这些原则将提高石油毒性数据在决策中的可比性和实用性。