Kawasumi Yusuke, Usui Akihito, Sato Yuki, Sato Yumi, Daigaku Nami, Hosokai Yoshiyuki, Hayashizaki Yoshie, Funayama Masato, Ishibashi Tadashi
Department of Clinical Imaging, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.
Department of Diagnostic Image Analysis, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.
Eur Radiol. 2016 Apr;26(4):1186-90. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3909-7. Epub 2015 Jul 11.
To evaluate the difference in sinus fluid volume and density between saltwater and freshwater drowning and diagnose saltwater drowning in distinction from freshwater drowning.
Ninety-three drowning cases (22 saltwater and 71 freshwater) were retrospectively investigated; all had undergone post-mortem CT and forensic autopsy. Sinus fluid volume and density were calculated using a 3D-DICOM workstation, and differences were evaluated. Diagnostic performance of these indicators for saltwater drowning was evaluated using a cut-off value calculated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
The median sinus fluid volume was 5.68 mL in cases of saltwater drowning (range 0.08 to 37.55) and 5.46 mL in cases of freshwater drowning (0.02 to 27.68), and the average densities were 47.28 (14.26 to 75.98) HU and 32.56 (-14.38 to 77.43) HU, respectively. While sinus volume did not differ significantly (p = 0.6000), sinus density was significantly higher in saltwater than freshwater drowning cases (p = 0.0002). ROC analysis for diagnosis of saltwater drowning determined the cut-off value as 37.77 HU, with a sensitivity of 77 %, specificity of 72 %, PPV of 46 % and NPV of 91 %.
The average density of sinus fluid in cases of saltwater drowning was significantly higher than in freshwater drowning cases; there was no significant difference in the sinus fluid volume.
• Sinus fluid density of saltwater drowning is significantly higher than freshwater drowning. • Cut-off value was 37.77 HU based on the ROC analysis. • The cut-off value translated to 91 % NPV for diagnosis of saltwater drowning.
评估海水溺水和淡水溺水时鼻窦液体积和密度的差异,以鉴别诊断海水溺水与淡水溺水。
回顾性调查93例溺水病例(22例海水溺水和71例淡水溺水);所有病例均进行了死后CT检查和法医尸检。使用三维DICOM工作站计算鼻窦液体积和密度,并评估差异。通过受试者操作特征(ROC)分析计算出的临界值,评估这些指标对海水溺水的诊断性能。
海水溺水病例的鼻窦液体积中位数为5.68 mL(范围0.08至37.55),淡水溺水病例为5.46 mL(0.02至27.68),平均密度分别为47.28(14.26至75.98)HU和32.56(-14.38至77.43)HU。虽然鼻窦体积无显著差异(p = 0.6000),但海水溺水病例的鼻窦密度显著高于淡水溺水病例(p = 0.0002)。诊断海水溺水的ROC分析确定临界值为37.77 HU,敏感性为77%,特异性为72%,阳性预测值为46%,阴性预测值为91%。
海水溺水病例的鼻窦液平均密度显著高于淡水溺水病例;鼻窦液体积无显著差异。
• 海水溺水的鼻窦液密度显著高于淡水溺水。• 根据ROC分析,临界值为37.77 HU。• 该临界值用于诊断海水溺水时阴性预测值为91%。