Rossen Jenny, Yngve Agneta, Hagströmer Maria, Brismar Kerstin, Ainsworth Barbara E, Iskull Christina, Möller Peter, Johansson Unn-Britt
Sophiahemmet University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Sciences and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jul 12;15:647. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1941-9.
Physical activity prevents or delays progression of impaired glucose tolerance in high-risk individuals. Physical activity promotion should serve as a basis in diabetes care. It is necessary to develop and evaluate health-promoting methods that are feasible as well as cost-effective within diabetes care. The aim of Sophia Step Study is to evaluate the impact of a multi-component and a single component physical activity intervention aiming at improving HbA1c (primary outcome) and other metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors, physical activity levels and overall health in patients with pre- and type 2 diabetes.
METHODS/DESIGN: Sophia Step Study is a randomized controlled trial and participants are randomly assigned to either a multi-component intervention group (A), a pedometer group (B) or a control group (C). In total, 310 patients will be included and followed for 24 months. Group A participants are offered pedometers and a website to register steps, physical activity on prescription with yearly follow-ups, motivational interviewing (10 occasions) and group consultations (including walks, 12 occasions). Group B participants are offered pedometers and a website to register steps. Group C are offered usual care. The theoretical framework underpinning the interventions is the Health Belief Model, the Stages of Change Model, and the Social Cognitive Theory. Both the multi-component intervention (group A) and the pedometer intervention (group B) are using several techniques for behavior change such as self-monitoring, goal setting, feedback and relapse prevention. Measurements are made at week 0, 8, 12, 16, month 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24, including metabolic and cardiovascular biomarkers (HbA1c as primary health outcome), accelerometry and daily steps. Furthermore, questionnaires were used to evaluate dietary intake, physical activity, perceived ability to perform physical activity, perceived support for being active, quality of life, anxiety, depression, well-being, perceived treatment, perceived stress and diabetes self- efficacy.
This study will show if a multi-component intervention using pedometers with group- and individual consultations is more effective than a single- component intervention using pedometers alone, in increasing physical activity and improving HbA1c, other metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors, physical activity levels and overall health in patients with pre- and type 2 diabetes.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02374788 . Registered 28 January 2015.
体育活动可预防或延缓高危个体糖耐量受损的进展。促进体育活动应作为糖尿病护理的基础。有必要开发和评估在糖尿病护理中可行且具有成本效益的健康促进方法。索菲亚阶梯研究的目的是评估多组分和单组分体育活动干预对改善糖化血红蛋白(主要结局)以及其他代谢和心血管危险因素、体育活动水平和 1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者整体健康状况的影响。
方法/设计:索菲亚阶梯研究是一项随机对照试验,参与者被随机分配到多组分干预组(A 组)、计步器组(B 组)或对照组(C 组)。总共将纳入 310 名患者并随访 24 个月。A 组参与者会获得计步器和一个用于记录步数的网站、按处方进行的体育活动及年度随访、动机性访谈(10 次)和小组咨询(包括散步,12 次)。B 组参与者会获得计步器和一个用于记录步数的网站。C 组接受常规护理。干预措施的理论框架是健康信念模型、行为改变阶段模型和社会认知理论。多组分干预(A 组)和计步器干预(B 组)都使用了多种行为改变技术,如自我监测、目标设定、反馈和预防复发。在第 0、8、12、16 周,第 6、9、12、18 和 24 个月进行测量,包括代谢和心血管生物标志物(糖化血红蛋白作为主要健康结局)、加速度计测量和每日步数。此外,使用问卷来评估饮食摄入、体育活动、感知的体育活动能力、感知的活动支持、生活质量、焦虑、抑郁、幸福感、感知的治疗、感知的压力和糖尿病自我效能。
本研究将表明,在增加体育活动以及改善 1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者的糖化血红蛋白、其他代谢和心血管危险因素、体育活动水平和整体健康状况方面,使用计步器并结合小组和个体咨询的多组分干预是否比仅使用计步器的单组分干预更有效。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02374788。于 2015 年 1 月 28 日注册。