Sarkaria Inderpal S, Finley David J, Bains Manjit S, Adusumilli Prasad S, Rizk Nabil P, Huang James, Downey Robert J, Rusch Valerie W, Jones David R
From the *Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA; and the †Department of Thoracic Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH USA.
Innovations (Phila). 2015 May-Jun;10(3):170-3. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000160.
Although the technical aspects of robotic video-assisted thoracic surgery (RVATS) for lung resections may be advantageous, compared with standard thoracoscopy, complications of chylothorax and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (RLNI) associated with mediastinal lymph node dissection (MLND) may be significant.
Consecutive patients who underwent RVATS anatomic lung resection for suspected or confirmed cancer and experienced RLNI or chylothorax were identified and reviewed from a prospectively maintained database. Complications were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0.
From July 28, 2010, to December 20, 2013, 251 patients underwent RVATS segmentectomy, lobectomy, or bilobectomy with MLND. Eleven patients (4.4%) experienced MLND-related complications and composed the study group; 81.8% were right-sided resections, and the median lymph node counts in right station IV and station VII were 9 (range, 1-23) and 5.5 (range, 1-10); 72.7% of the cases were performed for early-stage I and II lung cancers. Chylothorax [6/251 (2.4%)] and RLNI [6/251 (2.4%)] were significantly more common in the RVATS group than in the open thoracotomy and standard VATS groups. Complications requiring procedural intervention (Grade 3) are as follows: 4 cases of RLNI in patients undergoing percutaneous vocal cord medialization and 3 cases of chylothorax in patients undergoing image-guided thoracic duct embolization or maceration. No operative interventions were required.
RVATS MLND may be associated with increased rates of chylothorax and RLNI. Attention must be paid to identifying potential technical pitfalls with RVATS lung resections, adjusting surgical techniques accordingly, and minimizing patient morbidity.
尽管机器人电视辅助胸腔镜手术(RVATS)用于肺切除的技术方面可能具有优势,但与标准胸腔镜检查相比,与纵隔淋巴结清扫术(MLND)相关的乳糜胸和喉返神经损伤(RLNI)并发症可能较为严重。
从一个前瞻性维护的数据库中识别并回顾连续接受RVATS解剖性肺切除以怀疑或确诊癌症且发生RLNI或乳糜胸的患者。并发症根据不良事件通用术语标准第3.0版进行分级。
从2010年7月28日至2013年12月20日,251例患者接受了RVATS节段切除术、肺叶切除术或双肺叶切除术并进行了MLND。11例患者(4.4%)发生了与MLND相关的并发症并组成研究组;81.8%为右侧切除术,右侧第IV站和第VII站的中位淋巴结计数分别为9个(范围1 - 23个)和5.5个(范围1 - 10个);72.7%的病例为早期I期和II期肺癌。RVATS组中乳糜胸[6/251(2.4%)]和RLNI[6/251(2.4%)]明显比开胸手术组和标准VATS组更常见。需要进行手术干预(3级)的并发症如下:4例接受经皮声带内移术的患者发生RLNI,3例接受影像引导下胸导管栓塞或清创术的患者发生乳糜胸。无需进行手术干预。
RVATS MLND可能与乳糜胸和RLNI发生率增加有关。必须注意识别RVATS肺切除的潜在技术陷阱,相应调整手术技术,并将患者发病率降至最低。