Gilligan Megan, Suitor J Jill, Feld Scott, Pillemer Karl
Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Iowa State University, 2330 Palmer HDFS Building, Ames, IA 50011.
Department of Sociology, Purdue University, 700 W. State St., West Lafayette IN 47907.
J Marriage Fam. 2015 Feb;77(1):261-276. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12146.
Ambivalence has become an important conceptual development in the study of parent-adult child relations, with evidence highlighting that intergenerational relationships are characterized by a mix of positive and negative components. Recent studies have shown that ambivalence has detrimental consequences for both parents' and adult children's psychological well-being. The underlying assumption of this line of research is that psychological distress results from holding simultaneous positive and negative feelings toward a parent or child. The authors question this assumption and explore alternative interpretations by disaggregating the positive and negative dimensions commonly used to create indirect measures of intergenerational ambivalence. Data for the analyses were collected from 254 older mothers and a randomly selected adult child from each of the families. The findings suggest that the negative component is primarily responsible for the association between indirect measures of ambivalence and psychological well-being. Implications of these findings for the study of intergenerational ambivalence are discussed.
矛盾心理已成为亲子关系研究中的一个重要概念发展,有证据表明代际关系的特点是积极和消极成分并存。最近的研究表明,矛盾心理对父母和成年子女的心理健康都有不利影响。这一系列研究的潜在假设是,心理困扰源于对父母或子女同时持有积极和消极的情感。作者对这一假设提出质疑,并通过分解通常用于间接衡量代际矛盾心理的积极和消极维度来探索其他解释。分析数据来自254位老年母亲以及每个家庭中随机挑选的一名成年子女。研究结果表明,消极成分主要导致了矛盾心理间接衡量指标与心理健康之间的关联。本文讨论了这些研究结果对代际矛盾心理研究的启示。