Conway Christopher C, Hammen Constance, Brennan Patricia A
Center for Anxiety and Related Disorders, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
J Pers Disord. 2016 Aug;30(4):545-66. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2015_29_218. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
Transdiagnostic models hold promise for transforming research and treatment practices for personality disorders (PDs), but widespread acceptance and implementation of such approaches will require persuasive evidence of construct validity and clinical utility. Toward that end, the authors examined the criterion-related validity of a transdiagnostic PD model in relation to psychosocial and clinical outcomes in a high-risk community sample of 700 young adults. Participants and their mothers completed semistructured interviews to assess young adults' PD symptomatology, psychosocial functioning, suicidality, and mental health treatment use. Bifactor modeling revealed an overarching dimension of PD severity-capturing symptoms across all PD categories-that strongly predicted all functional and clinical outcomes in multivariate analyses. Effect sizes for lower-order, specific PD processes were comparatively modest for functional outcomes; however, they provided clinically significant information about suicide risk and treatment use. The authors discuss implications of a transdiagnostic perspective for research on PD etiology, classification, and treatment.
跨诊断模型有望改变人格障碍(PDs)的研究和治疗实践,但此类方法的广泛接受和实施需要有说服力的结构效度和临床效用证据。为此,作者在一个由700名年轻成年人组成的高风险社区样本中,研究了跨诊断人格障碍模型与心理社会及临床结果相关的效标效度。参与者及其母亲完成了半结构化访谈,以评估年轻成年人的人格障碍症状、心理社会功能、自杀倾向和心理健康治疗使用情况。双因素模型揭示了一个跨所有人格障碍类别的人格障碍严重程度总体维度,在多变量分析中,该维度强烈预测了所有功能和临床结果。低阶、特定人格障碍过程对功能结果的效应量相对较小;然而,它们提供了有关自杀风险和治疗使用的具有临床意义的信息。作者讨论了跨诊断视角对人格障碍病因、分类和治疗研究的影响。