Sebastiani Laura, Castellani Eleonora, Gemignani Angelo, Artoni Fiorenzo, Menicucci Danilo
Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Brain Res. 2015 Oct 5;1622:386-96. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.06.042. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
Priming is an implicit memory effect in which previous exposure to one stimulus influences the response to another stimulus. The main characteristic of priming is that it occurs without awareness. Priming takes place also when the physical attributes of previously studied and test stimuli do not match; in fact, it greatly refers to a general stimulus representation activated at encoding independently of the sensory modality engaged. Our aim was to evaluate whether, in a cross-modal word-stem completion task, negative priming scores could depend on inefficient word processing at study and therefore on an altered stimulus representation. Words were presented in the auditory modality, and word-stems to be completed in the visual modality. At study, we recorded auditory ERPs, and compared the P300 (attention/memory) and N400 (meaning processing) of individuals with positive and negative priming. Besides classical averaging-based ERPs analysis, we used an ICA-based method (ErpICASSO) to separate the potentials related to different processes contributing to ERPs. Classical analysis yielded significant difference between the two waves across the whole scalp. ErpICASSO allowed separating the novelty-related P3a and the top-down control-related P3b sub-components of P300. Specifically, in the component C3, the positive deflection identifiable as P3b, was significantly greater in the positive than in the negative priming group, while the late negative deflection corresponding to the parietal N400, was reduced in the positive priming group. In conclusion, inadequacy of specific processes at encoding, such as attention and/or meaning retrieval, could generate weak semantic representations, making words less accessible in subsequent implicit retrieval.
启动效应是一种内隐记忆效应,即先前对一种刺激的接触会影响对另一种刺激的反应。启动效应的主要特征是它在无意识的情况下发生。当先前学习的刺激和测试刺激的物理属性不匹配时,启动效应也会发生;事实上,它很大程度上指的是在编码时激活的一种通用刺激表征,与所涉及的感觉模态无关。我们的目的是评估在跨模态词干补全任务中,负启动分数是否可能取决于学习时低效的单词处理,进而取决于改变的刺激表征。单词以听觉形式呈现,词干以视觉形式呈现以供补全。在学习阶段,我们记录听觉事件相关电位(ERP),并比较具有正启动和负启动的个体的P300(注意力/记忆)和N400(语义处理)。除了基于经典平均的ERP分析外,我们还使用了基于独立成分分析(ICA)的方法(ErpICASSO)来分离与ERP中不同过程相关的电位。经典分析在整个头皮上的这两个波之间产生了显著差异。ErpICASSO能够分离与新颖性相关的P3a和与自上而下控制相关的P300的P3b子成分。具体而言,在C3成分中,可识别为P3b的正偏转在正启动组中比负启动组中显著更大,而对应于顶叶N400的晚期负偏转在正启动组中减少。总之,编码时特定过程(如注意力和/或意义检索)的不足可能会产生较弱的语义表征,使单词在随后的内隐检索中更难被提取。