Yeo Seung-Gu
Department of Radiation Oncology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Cheonan 330-721, Republic of Korea.
Oncol Lett. 2015 Jul;10(1):497-501. doi: 10.3892/ol.2015.3205. Epub 2015 May 13.
The aim of the present study was to investigate the dosimetric advantages of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) for thoracic spine metastases and compare it with conventional two-dimensional (2D) plans. Radiation therapy (RT) planning data of 10 patients with mid-to-low thoracic spine metastases were analyzed. Computed tomography simulation was performed and the planning target volume (PTV), heart, esophagus, lung and spinal cord were contoured. The 3DCRT plan comprised one posteroanterior (PA) field and two posterior oblique fields. The 2D plans used a single PA field or opposed anteroposterior (AP)/PA fields. The prescription dose of radiation was 30 Gy in 10 fractions. All comparisons of the maximum or mean doses to the organs at risk or the PTV, between two of the three RT plans, demonstrated statistically significant differences (P<0.05), with the exception of the mean esophageal doses between the single PA vs. AP/PA (P=0.285) plans. The mean heart doses were 15.0±3.1 Gy in single PA, 17.3±4.3 Gy in AP/PA and 8.5±1.7 Gy using 3DCRT. The median reduction rates using 3DCRT were 38.9% compared with single PA (range, 29.4-58.5%) or 47.5% relative to AP/PA (range, 34.5-67.1%). The mean esophageal doses were 17.9±2.3 Gy in single PA, 18.2±2.2 Gy in AP/PA and 15.3±1.9 Gy in 3DCRT. The median reduction rate using 3DCRT was 12.8% compared with single PA or 15.6% relative to AP/PA. Compared with the single PA or AP/PA 2D plan, 3DCRT reduced the median dose by 13.7 or 1.9% of the maximum spinal cord dose, respectively, and 14.7 or 2.9% of the maximum PTV dose, respectively. The mean lung doses were 2.7±0.7 Gy in single PA, 2.6±0.7 Gy in AP/PA and 5.1±1.0 Gy in 3DCRT. In conclusion, 3DCRT for mid-to-low thoracic spine metastases demonstrated significant dosimetric advantages by reducing the unnecessary irradiation of critical organs, particularly the heart, and by achieving a homogeneous target dose.
本研究的目的是探讨三维适形放射治疗(3DCRT)用于胸椎转移瘤的剂量学优势,并将其与传统二维(2D)计划进行比较。分析了10例中低位胸椎转移瘤患者的放射治疗(RT)计划数据。进行了计算机断层扫描模拟,并勾勒出计划靶区(PTV)、心脏、食管、肺和脊髓。3DCRT计划包括一个前后(PA)野和两个后斜野。2D计划使用单个PA野或前后对穿(AP)/PA野。放射处方剂量为30 Gy,分10次给予。在三种RT计划中的两种之间,对危及器官或PTV的最大或平均剂量进行的所有比较均显示出统计学显著差异(P<0.05),但单个PA野与AP/PA野计划之间的平均食管剂量除外(P=0.285)。单个PA野计划的平均心脏剂量为15.0±3.1 Gy,AP/PA野计划为17.3±4.3 Gy,3DCRT计划为8.5±1.7 Gy。与单个PA野相比,3DCRT计划的中位数降低率为38.9%(范围为29.4-58.5%),相对于AP/PA野为47.5%(范围为34.5-67.1%)。单个PA野计划的平均食管剂量为17.9±2.3 Gy,AP/PA野计划为18.2±2.2 Gy,3DCRT计划为15.3±1.9 Gy。与单个PA野相比,3DCRT计划的中位数降低率为12.8%,相对于AP/PA野为15.6%。与单个PA或AP/PA 2D计划相比,3DCRT分别将脊髓最大剂量的中位数降低了13.7%或1.9%,将PTV最大剂量的中位数降低了14.7%或2.9%。单个PA野计划的平均肺剂量为2.7±0.7 Gy,AP/PA野计划为2.6±0.7 Gy,3DCRT计划为5.1±1.0 Gy。总之,3DCRT用于中低位胸椎转移瘤通过减少关键器官尤其是心脏的不必要照射以及实现均匀的靶区剂量,显示出显著的剂量学优势。