• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单野放射治疗脊柱骨转移瘤时规定的照射点的变异性:日本实践模式调查。

Variability in the point to which single direct field irradiation is prescribed for spinal bone metastases: a survey of practice patterns in Japan.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, St Luke's International Hospital, 9-1, Akashicho, Chuouku, Tokyo, 104-8560, Japan.

出版信息

J Radiat Res. 2013 Nov 1;54(6):1065-8. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrt044. Epub 2013 May 3.

DOI:10.1093/jrr/rrt044
PMID:23645455
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3823772/
Abstract

Direct single fields are commonly used in radiotherapy for spinal bone metastases, and it is crucial to define the point for which the dose is prescribed. According to the guidelines from the International Bone Metastases Consensus Working Party (IBMCWP) updated in 2010, different opinions exist on whether this therapy should be prescribed to the mid-vertebral or anterior vertebral body. To our knowledge, no previous studies have surveyed practice patterns regarding this discrepancy. Therefore, we performed an Internet-based survey of members of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group (JROSG) to investigate the current practice patterns in Japan. The respondents mentioned the point to which they prescribed radiotherapy for a single direct field. A total of 52 radiation oncologists from 50 institutions (36% of JROSG institutions) responded. Respondent prescription for radiotherapy varied widely. Only 21% and 6% of respondents prescribed irradiation to the mid-vertebral body and anterior vertebral body, respectively. A larger proportion of respondents (27%) prescribed irradiation to the spinal cord (center of the spinal canal). Still another group of respondents (27%) stated that they never use a single direct field. In conclusion, the point to which irradiation dosages are prescribed varies widely for a single direct field in cases of spinal bone metastases. This variation may lead some radiation oncologists to misunderstand the tolerance dosage of the spinal cord, especially in cases of re-irradiation. Thus, careful consideration is required before any prescriptions are made.

摘要

直接单野照射常用于脊柱骨转移的放射治疗,为规定剂量,准确界定照射点至关重要。根据国际骨骼转移共识工作组(IBMCWP)2010 年更新的指南,对于该疗法是应规定于椎体中部还是前椎体,存在不同意见。据我们所知,既往研究并未调查过这种差异的实践模式。因此,我们对日本放射肿瘤学研究组(JROSG)的成员进行了一项基于互联网的调查,以调查日本目前的实践模式。受访者提到了他们为单个直接野规定放射治疗的点。共有来自 50 个机构的 52 名放射肿瘤学家(JROSG 机构的 36%)做出了回应。受访者对放射治疗的处方差异很大。只有 21%和 6%的受访者分别规定照射到椎体中部和前椎体。更大比例的受访者(27%)规定照射到脊髓(椎管中心)。还有一组受访者(27%)表示他们从不使用单个直接野。总之,在脊柱骨转移的情况下,对于单个直接野,规定照射剂量的点差异很大。这种差异可能导致一些放射肿瘤学家误解脊髓的耐受剂量,尤其是在再照射的情况下。因此,在做出任何规定之前,需要仔细考虑。

相似文献

1
Variability in the point to which single direct field irradiation is prescribed for spinal bone metastases: a survey of practice patterns in Japan.单野放射治疗脊柱骨转移瘤时规定的照射点的变异性:日本实践模式调查。
J Radiat Res. 2013 Nov 1;54(6):1065-8. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrt044. Epub 2013 May 3.
2
Patterns of practice in palliative radiotherapy for painful bone metastases: a survey in Japan.癌症骨转移疼痛的姑息性放疗实践模式:日本的一项调查。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 May 1;83(1):e117-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.11.075. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
3
National survey of radiation oncologists' practice patterns regarding hormone-naïve prostate cancer with bone metastases.全国范围内针对无激素治疗且伴有骨转移的前列腺癌的放射肿瘤学家的实践模式调查。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 28;50(10):1188-1194. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa111.
4
Spine Metastasis Practice Patterns among Korean, Chinese, and Japanese Radiation Oncologists: A Multinational Online Survey Study.韩国、中国和日本放射肿瘤学家的脊柱转移瘤治疗模式:一项跨国在线调查研究
J Radiat Res. 2017 Jan;58(1):155-163. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrw089. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
5
Variation in Practice Patterns of Korean Radiation Oncologists for Spine Metastasis between 2009 and 2014.2009年至2014年韩国放射肿瘤学家对脊柱转移瘤的治疗模式差异
Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Jul;48(3):1102-9. doi: 10.4143/crt.2015.207. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
6
Palliative radiation for vertebral metastases: the effect of variation in prescription parameters on the dose received at depth.椎体转移瘤的姑息性放疗:处方参数变化对深部受量的影响
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Mar 15;52(4):1083-91. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)02738-9.
7
Patterns of radiotherapy practice for pancreatic cancer in Japan: results of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group (JROSG) survey.日本胰腺癌放射治疗实践模式:日本放射肿瘤学研究组(JROSG)调查结果。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Jul 1;77(3):743-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.05.063. Epub 2009 Oct 29.
8
Consensus guidelines for postoperative stereotactic body radiation therapy for spinal metastases: results of an international survey.脊柱转移瘤术后立体定向体部放射治疗的共识指南:一项国际调查结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Mar;26(3):299-306. doi: 10.3171/2016.8.SPINE16121. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
9
Palliation of bone metastases: a survey of patterns of practice among Canadian radiation oncologists.骨转移瘤的姑息治疗:加拿大放射肿瘤学家的实践模式调查
Radiother Oncol. 2000 Sep;56(3):305-14. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(00)00238-3.
10
The INTER-ROMA project--a survey among Italian radiation oncologists on their approach to the treatment of bone metastases.INTER-ROMA项目——一项针对意大利放射肿瘤学家对骨转移瘤治疗方法的调查。
Tumori. 2011 Mar-Apr;97(2):177-84. doi: 10.1177/030089161109700208.

引用本文的文献

1
Palliative radiotherapy for thoracic spine metastases: Dosimetric advantage of three-dimensional conformal plans.胸椎转移瘤的姑息性放疗:三维适形计划的剂量学优势
Oncol Lett. 2015 Jul;10(1):497-501. doi: 10.3892/ol.2015.3205. Epub 2015 May 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Patterns of practice in palliative radiotherapy for painful bone metastases: a survey in Japan.癌症骨转移疼痛的姑息性放疗实践模式:日本的一项调查。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 May 1;83(1):e117-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.11.075. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
2
Update on the systematic review of palliative radiotherapy trials for bone metastases.骨转移姑息性放疗临床试验的系统评价更新。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2012 Mar;24(2):112-24. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2011.11.004. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
3
Update of the international consensus on palliative radiotherapy endpoints for future clinical trials in bone metastases.骨转移姑息性放疗终点的国际共识更新:未来临床试验的应用。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Apr 1;82(5):1730-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.02.008. Epub 2011 Apr 12.
4
Palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases: an ASTRO evidence-based guideline.姑息性放疗治疗骨转移瘤:ASTRO 循证指南。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Mar 15;79(4):965-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.11.026. Epub 2011 Jan 27.
5
Prospective randomised multicenter trial on single fraction radiotherapy (8 Gy x 1) versus multiple fractions (3 Gy x 10) in the treatment of painful bone metastases.关于单次分割放疗(8 Gy×1)与多次分割放疗(3 Gy×10)治疗疼痛性骨转移的前瞻性随机多中心试验。
Radiother Oncol. 2006 Jun;79(3):278-84. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2006.05.006. Epub 2006 Jun 21.
6
A phase III international randomised trial comparing single with multiple fractions for re-irradiation of painful bone metastases: National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG) SC 20.一项比较单次分割与多次分割用于疼痛性骨转移再照射的III期国际随机试验:加拿大国家癌症研究所临床试验组(NCIC CTG)SC 20。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2006 Mar;18(2):125-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2005.11.014.
7
Randomized trial of short- versus long-course radiotherapy for palliation of painful bone metastases.短疗程与长疗程放射治疗缓解骨转移疼痛的随机试验。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Jun 1;97(11):798-804. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji139.
8
Randomized trial of 8 Gy in 1 versus 20 Gy in 5 fractions of radiotherapy for neuropathic pain due to bone metastases (Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group, TROG 96.05).针对骨转移所致神经性疼痛的放疗,8Gy单次分割与20Gy分5次分割的随机试验(跨塔斯曼放射肿瘤学组,TROG 96.05)
Radiother Oncol. 2005 Apr;75(1):54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2004.09.017. Epub 2004 Oct 28.
9
Proposal of human spinal cord reirradiation dose based on collection of data from 40 patients.基于40例患者数据收集的人类脊髓再照射剂量方案。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Mar 1;61(3):851-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.06.016.
10
International consensus on palliative radiotherapy endpoints for future clinical trials in bone metastases.骨转移瘤未来临床试验姑息性放疗终点的国际共识。
Radiother Oncol. 2002 Sep;64(3):275-80. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(02)00170-6.