Dakkak Melissa, Baxi Khyati, Patel Ambar
Departments of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, University of Florida Health, Jacksonville, FL 32209, USA.
Case Rep Cardiol. 2015;2015:753537. doi: 10.1155/2015/753537. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
The use of an implantable cardiac defibrillator has been advocated as the only effective treatment for the management of ventricular fibrillation (VF) in patients with Brugada Syndrome (BrS). However, this device is only useful for terminating VF. Intermittent and/or recalcitrant VF for which lifesaving cardioversion occurs is a problematic situation in this patient population. The immediate use of appropriate antiarrhythmics in the acute setting has proven to be lifesaving. Quinidine has been well established as an effective antiarrhythmic in BrS, while isoproterenol (ISP) has had some recognition as well. The addition of drug therapy to prevent the induction of these arrhythmias has been shown to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with BrS. It was proven to be especially effective in the presence of early repolarization, evidenced by the reduction or normalization of the early repolarization pattern on ECG. Thus, for the prophylactic management and long term suppression of VF in BrS, further prospective studies should be performed to determine the effectiveness of quinidine and ISP in this patient population.
植入式心脏除颤器已被提倡作为治疗Brugada综合征(BrS)患者室颤(VF)的唯一有效方法。然而,该设备仅对终止室颤有用。对于该患者群体而言,发生挽救生命的心脏复律的间歇性和/或顽固性室颤是一个棘手的情况。在急性情况下立即使用适当的抗心律失常药物已被证明可挽救生命。奎尼丁已被公认为是治疗BrS的有效抗心律失常药物,而异丙肾上腺素(ISP)也得到了一定认可。已表明添加药物治疗以预防这些心律失常的诱发可降低与BrS相关的发病率和死亡率。事实证明,在存在早期复极的情况下,它特别有效,心电图上早期复极模式的减少或正常化证明了这一点。因此,为了对BrS患者进行预防性管理和长期抑制室颤,应进行进一步的前瞻性研究,以确定奎尼丁和ISP对该患者群体的有效性。