Haïssaguerre Michel, Sacher Frederic, Nogami Akihiko, Komiya Nohiriro, Bernard Anne, Probst Vincent, Yli-Mayry Sinikka, Defaye Pascal, Aizawa Yoshifusa, Frank Robert, Mantovan Roberto, Cappato Riccardo, Wolpert Christian, Leenhardt Antoine, de Roy Luc, Heidbuchel Hein, Deisenhofer Isabel, Arentz Thomas, Pasquié Jean-Luc, Weerasooriya Rukshen, Hocini Meleze, Jais Pierre, Derval Nicolas, Bordachar Pierre, Clémenty Jacques
Université Bordeaux, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Université Bordeaux, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Feb 17;53(7):612-619. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.10.044.
Our purpose was to evaluate the efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) in recurrent ventricular fibrillation (VF) associated with inferolateral early repolarization pattern on the electrocardiogram.
Although an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator is the treatment of choice, additional AADs may be necessary to prevent frequent episodes of VF and reduce implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock burden or as a lifesaving therapy in electrical storms.
From a multicenter cohort of 122 patients (90 male subjects, age 37 +/- 12 years) with idiopathic VF and early repolarization abnormality in the inferolateral leads, we selected all patients with more than 3 episodes of VF (multiple) including those with electrical storms (> or =3 VF in 24 h). The choice of AAD was decided by individual physicians. Follow-up data were obtained for all patients using monitoring with implantable defibrillator. Successful oral AAD was defined as elimination of all recurrences of VF with a minimal follow-up period of 12 months.
Multiple episodes of VF were observed in 33 (27%) patients. Electrical storms (34 +/- 47 episodes) occurred in 16 and were unresponsive to beta-blockers (11 of 11), lidocaine/mexiletine (9 of 9), and verapamil (3 of 3), while amiodarone was partially effective (3 of 10). In contrast, isoproterenol infusion immediately suppressed electrical storms in 7 of 7 patients. Over a follow-up of 69 +/- 58 months, oral AADs were poorly effective in preventing recurrent VF: beta-blockers (2 of 16), verapamil (0 of 4), mexiletine (0 of 4), amiodarone (1 of 7), and class 1C AADs (2 of 9). Quinidine was successful in 9 of 9 patients, decreasing recurrent VF from 33 +/- 35 episodes to nil for 25 +/- 18 months. In addition, quinidine restored a normal electrocardiogram.
Multiple recurrences of VF occurred in 27% of patients with early repolarization abnormality and may be life threatening. Isoproterenol in acute cases and quinidine in chronic cases are effective AADs.
我们的目的是评估抗心律失常药物(AADs)对心电图表现为下侧壁早期复极模式的复发性室颤(VF)的疗效。
虽然植入式心脏复律除颤器是首选治疗方法,但可能需要额外使用AADs来预防VF的频繁发作、减轻植入式心脏复律除颤器的电击负担,或作为电风暴中的挽救生命的治疗方法。
在一个多中心队列中,有122例特发性VF且下侧壁导联存在早期复极异常的患者(90例男性,年龄37±12岁),我们选择了所有VF发作超过3次(多次发作)的患者,包括那些发生电风暴的患者(24小时内≥3次VF)。AAD的选择由个体医生决定。使用植入式除颤器监测获取所有患者的随访数据。成功的口服AAD定义为在至少12个月的随访期内消除所有VF复发。
33例(27%)患者观察到多次VF发作。16例发生了电风暴(34±47次发作),对β受体阻滞剂(11例中的11例)、利多卡因/美西律(9例中的9例)和维拉帕米(3例中的3例)无反应,而胺碘酮部分有效(10例中的3例)。相比之下,7例患者中有7例静脉输注异丙肾上腺素立即抑制了电风暴。在69±58个月的随访中,口服AADs预防VF复发的效果不佳:β受体阻滞剂(16例中的2例)、维拉帕米(4例中的0例)、美西律(4例中的0例)、胺碘酮(7例中的1例)和1C类AADs(9例中的2例)。奎尼丁在9例患者中有9例成功,使VF复发从33±35次发作减少至0次,持续25±18个月。此外,奎尼丁使心电图恢复正常。
27%的早期复极异常患者发生多次VF复发,可能危及生命。急性病例中异丙肾上腺素和慢性病例中奎尼丁是有效的AADs。