Szabó Zoltán, Ujvárosy Dóra, Ötvös Tamás, Sebestyén Veronika, Nánási Péter P
Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Doctoral School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Jan 29;10:1640. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01640. eCollection 2019.
Ventricular fibrillation (VF) and sudden cardiac death (SCD) are predominantly caused by channelopathies and cardiomyopathies in youngsters and coronary heart disease in the elderly. Temporary factors, e.g., electrolyte imbalance, drug interactions, and substance abuses may play an additive role in arrhythmogenesis. Ectopic automaticity, triggered activity, and reentry mechanisms are known as important electrophysiological substrates for VF determining the antiarrhythmic therapies at the same time. Emergency need for electrical cardioversion is supported by the fact that every minute without defibrillation decreases survival rates by approximately 7%-10%. Thus, early defibrillation is an essential part of antiarrhythmic emergency management. Drug therapy has its relevance rather in the prevention of sudden cardiac death, where early recognition and treatment of the underlying disease has significant importance. Cardioprotective and antiarrhythmic effects of beta blockers in patients predisposed to sudden cardiac death were highlighted in numerous studies, hence nowadays these drugs are considered to be the cornerstones of the prevention and treatment of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Nevertheless, other medical therapies have not been proven to be useful in the prevention of VF. Although amiodarone has shown positive results occasionally, this was not demonstrated to be consistent. Furthermore, the potential proarrhythmic effects of drugs may also limit their applicability. Based on these unfavorable observations we highlight the importance of arrhythmia prevention, where echocardiography, electrocardiography and laboratory testing play a significant role even in the emergency setting. In the following we provide a summary on the latest developments on cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and the evaluation and preventive treatment possibilities of patients with increased susceptibility to VF and SCD.
室颤(VF)和心源性猝死(SCD)在年轻人中主要由离子通道病和心肌病引起,在老年人中则主要由冠心病引起。诸如电解质失衡、药物相互作用和药物滥用等临时因素可能在心律失常的发生中起累加作用。异位自律性、触发活动和折返机制是已知的室颤重要电生理基础,同时也决定了抗心律失常治疗方法。每分钟未进行除颤会使生存率降低约7%-10%,这一事实支持了紧急进行电复律的必要性。因此,早期除颤是抗心律失常紧急处理的重要组成部分。药物治疗在预防心源性猝死方面具有相关性,其中对潜在疾病的早期识别和治疗至关重要。众多研究强调了β受体阻滞剂对易发生心源性猝死患者的心脏保护和抗心律失常作用,因此如今这些药物被认为是预防和治疗危及生命的室性心律失常的基石。然而,尚未证明其他医学疗法对预防室颤有用。尽管胺碘酮偶尔显示出阳性结果,但并未证明其具有一致性。此外,药物潜在的促心律失常作用也可能限制其适用性。基于这些不利观察结果,我们强调心律失常预防的重要性,其中超声心动图、心电图和实验室检查即使在紧急情况下也起着重要作用。接下来,我们将总结心肺复苏的最新进展,以及对室颤和心源性猝死易感性增加患者的评估和预防性治疗可能性。