仅有一种观点？——评 Evans 和 Stanovich（2013）的默认干预主义视角
Only One? The Default Interventionist Perspective as a Unimodel-Commentary on Evans & Stanovich (2013).
机构信息
University of Maryland
出版信息
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 May;8(3):242-7. doi: 10.1177/1745691613483477.
PMID:26172966
Abstract
Evans and Stanovich (2013, this issue) defend the dual-processing theories of higher cognition after first criticizing them on fundamental grounds. To make that possible, they resurrect the very distinctions between the two alleged "types" of processing that they formerly had rejected. At the end, however, the default-interventionist model they embrace, seems similar to the single-process unimodel they contest.
摘要
埃文斯和斯坦诺维奇（2013 年，本期）在从根本上批评了双重加工理论之后，为其进行了辩护。为了做到这一点，他们重新采用了之前被他们拒绝的两种所谓的“加工类型”之间的区别。然而，在最后，他们所接受的默认干预主义模型似乎与他们所质疑的单一加工单模型相似。
Zotero 插件