Bellini-Leite Samuel C
Utilization Systems Department, Minas Gerais State University, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 21;13:805386. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.805386. eCollection 2022.
Dual Process Theory is currently a popular theory for explaining why we show bounded rationality in reasoning and decision-making tasks. This theory proposes there must be a sharp distinction in thinking to explain two clusters of correlational features. One cluster describes a fast and intuitive process (Type 1), while the other describes a slow and reflective one (Type 2). A problem for this theory is identifying a common principle that binds these features together, explaining why they form a unity, the unity problem. To solve it, a hypothesis is developed combining embodied predictive processing with symbolic classical approaches. The hypothesis, simplified, states that Type 1 processes are bound together because they rely on embodied predictive processing whereas Type 2 processes form a unity because they are accomplished by symbolic classical cognition. To show that this is likely the case, the features of Dual Process Theory are discussed in relation to these frameworks.
双加工理论是目前一种流行的理论，用于解释为何我们在推理和决策任务中表现出有限理性。该理论提出，思维中必须存在明显区分，以解释两组相关特征。一组描述快速且直观的过程（类型1），而另一组描述缓慢且反思性的过程（类型2）。该理论面临的一个问题是确定一个将这些特征联系在一起的共同原则，解释它们为何形成一个统一体，即统一问题。为了解决这个问题，人们提出了一个将具身预测加工与符号经典方法相结合的假设。简化后的假设表明，类型1过程因依赖具身预测加工而联系在一起，而类型2过程因通过符号经典认知来完成而形成一个统一体。为了说明情况很可能如此，我们将结合这些框架来讨论双加工理论的特征。
