• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双过程理论与两种类型的元认知监测和控制过程。

Dual-Process Theory and Two Types of Metacognitive Monitoring and Control Processes.

机构信息

King Danylo University, 35 Konovaltsia street, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018, Ukraine.

出版信息

Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2023 Dec;57(4):1273-1283. doi: 10.1007/s12124-023-09771-2. Epub 2023 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1007/s12124-023-09771-2
Abstract

Metacognitive monitoring and control processes are important parts of our cognitive system. In this article, they are considered in the light of the dual-process theory and interpreted as occurring at the level of Type 1 and Type 2 information processing. Associative connection is the main factor that allows us to divide these processes into two types. Accordingly, metacognitive monitoring of the first type occurs when feelings of rightness/error automatically appear along with a certain judgment. The second type occurs when a controlled inference is made about whether a judgment is true or false. Metacognitive control of the first type occurs when the decision to reject, revise or accept the received judgment is associated with the feelings of rightness/error and automatically appears when one of these feelings appears. The second type takes place when a person rejects (or they are unclear) the results of the first type of metacognitive control and deliberately decides what to do with the received judgment - reject, revise or accept.

摘要

元认知监控和控制过程是我们认知系统的重要组成部分。在本文中,它们是根据双加工理论来考虑的,并被解释为发生在 1 型和 2 型信息加工的水平上。联想联系是将这些过程分为两种类型的主要因素。相应地,当某种判断自动伴随着正确/错误的感觉出现时,就会发生第一类的元认知监控。当对判断是真还是假进行控制推断时,就会发生第二类。当与正确/错误的感觉相关联并在出现这些感觉之一时自动出现拒绝、修改或接受所收到判断的决定时,就会发生第一类元认知控制的元认知控制。当一个人拒绝(或不清楚)第一类元认知控制的结果,并故意决定如何处理所收到的判断——拒绝、修改或接受时,就会发生第二类。

相似文献

1
Dual-Process Theory and Two Types of Metacognitive Monitoring and Control Processes.双过程理论与两种类型的元认知监测和控制过程。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2023 Dec;57(4):1273-1283. doi: 10.1007/s12124-023-09771-2. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
2
Insight across mental disorders: A multifaceted metacognitive phenomenon.洞察精神障碍:一种多方面的元认知现象。
Psychiatriki. 2019 Jan-Mar;30(1):13-16. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2019.301.13.
3
Neural correlates of metacognitive ability and of feeling confident: a large-scale fMRI study.元认知能力与自信感的神经关联:一项大规模功能磁共振成像研究。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016 Dec;11(12):1942-1951. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsw093. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
4
Domain-specific and domain-general processes underlying metacognitive judgments.元认知判断背后的特定领域和一般领域过程。
Conscious Cogn. 2017 Mar;49:264-277. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
5
A systematic framework of creative metacognition.创造性元认知的系统框架。
Phys Life Rev. 2023 Sep;46:161-181. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2023.07.002. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
6
Rats show adaptive choice in a metacognitive task with high uncertainty.在具有高度不确定性的元认知任务中,大鼠表现出适应性选择。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2017 Jan;43(1):109-118. doi: 10.1037/xan0000130.
7
Optimal metacognitive control of memory recall.记忆回忆的最佳元认知控制。
Psychol Rev. 2024 Apr;131(3):781-811. doi: 10.1037/rev0000441. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
8
Response generation, not response execution, influences feelings of rightness in reasoning.反应生成而非反应执行,会影响推理中的正确感。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Oct;76(10):2379-2389. doi: 10.1177/17470218231156712. Epub 2023 Mar 26.
9
The influence of irrelevant emotionally negative stimuli on early and late retrospective metacognitive judgements.无关情绪性负性刺激对早期和晚期回溯元认知判断的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 May;77(5):1113-1124. doi: 10.1177/17470218231191516. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
10
The uncertainty response in animal-metacognition researchers.动物元认知研究中的不确定性反应。
J Comp Psychol. 2014 May;128(2):155-9; discussion 160-2. doi: 10.1037/a0036564.

本文引用的文献

1
On Dual- and Single-Process Models of Thinking.关于双重加工和单一加工模型的思考。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 Nov;16(6):1412-1427. doi: 10.1177/1745691620964172. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
2
The persuasive power of knowledge: Testing the confidence heuristic.知识的说服力:测试信心启发式。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Oct;147(10):1431-1444. doi: 10.1037/xge0000471. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
3
The Mythical Dual-Process Typology.神话般的双加工类型学。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Aug;22(8):667-668. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.04.008. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
4
The Mythical Number Two.二的神话。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Apr;22(4):280-293. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
5
Meta-Reasoning: Monitoring and Control of Thinking and Reasoning.元推理:思维和推理的监控与控制。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Aug;21(8):607-617. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
6
Oops, scratch that! Monitoring one's own errors during mental calculation.哎呀,别管那个!心算时监控自己的错误。
Cognition. 2016 Jan;146:110-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.09.005. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
7
A Tale of Two Systems: A Scientific Advance or a Theoretical Stone Soup? Commentary on Evans & Stanovich (2013).两种系统的故事:科学进步还是理论杂烩?对埃文斯和斯坦诺维奇(2013年)的评论
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 May;8(3):257-62. doi: 10.1177/1745691613483474.
8
A Case Study: Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition-Commentary on Evans & Stanovich (2013).一个案例研究:关于更高认知的双过程理论——评论 Evans 和 Stanovich(2013)。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 May;8(3):248-52. doi: 10.1177/1745691613483475.
9
Only One? The Default Interventionist Perspective as a Unimodel-Commentary on Evans & Stanovich (2013).仅有一种观点?——评 Evans 和 Stanovich(2013)的默认干预主义视角
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 May;8(3):242-7. doi: 10.1177/1745691613483477.
10
Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate.双重加工理论的高阶认知:推进辩论。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 May;8(3):223-41. doi: 10.1177/1745691612460685.