Dawkins Ross L, Miller Joseph H, Ramadan Omar I, Lysek Michael C, Kuhn Elizabeth N, Rocque Brandon G, Conklin Michael J, Tubbs R Shane, Walters Beverly C, Agee Bonita S, Rozzelle Curtis J
1Section of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Children's of Alabama, Department of Neurosurgery, and.
2UT Erlanger Neurosurgery, Chattanooga, Tennessee; and.
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018 Mar;21(3):284-291. doi: 10.3171/2017.7.PEDS1720. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
OBJECTIVE There are many classification systems for injuries of the thoracolumbar spine. The recent Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS) has been shown to be a reliable tool for adult patients. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of the TLICS system in pediatric patients. The validity of the TLICS system is assessed in a companion paper. METHODS The medical records of pediatric patients with acute, traumatic thoracolumbar fractures at a single Level 1 trauma center were retrospectively reviewed. A TLICS was calculated for each patient using CT and MRI, along with the neurological examination recorded in the patient's medical record. TLICSs were compared with the type of treatment received. Five raters scored all patients separately to assess interrater reliability. RESULTS TLICS calculations were completed for 81 patients. The mean patient age was 10.9 years. Girls represented 51.8% of the study population, and 80% of the study patients were white. The most common mechanisms of injury were motor vehicle accidents (60.5%), falls (17.3%), and all-terrain vehicle accidents (8.6%). The mean TLICS was 3.7 ± 2.8. Surgery was the treatment of choice for 33.3% of patients. The agreement between the TLICS-suggested treatment and the actual treatment received was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). The interrater reliability of the TLICS system ranged from moderate to very good, with a Fleiss' generalized kappa (κ) value of 0.69 for the TLICS treatment suggestion among all patients; however, interrater reliability decreased when MRI was used to contribute to the TLICS. The κ value decreased from 0.73 to 0.57 for patients with CT only vs patients with CT/MRI or MRI only, respectively (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, the agreement between suggested treatment and actual treatment was worse when MRI was used as part of injury assessment. CONCLUSIONS The TLICS system demonstrates good interrater reliability among physicians assessing thoracolumbar fracture treatment in pediatric patients. Physicians should be cautious when using MRI to aid in the surgical decision-making process.
胸腰椎损伤有多种分类系统。最近的胸腰椎损伤分类及严重程度评分(TLICS)已被证明是用于成年患者的可靠工具。本研究的目的是评估TLICS系统在儿科患者中的可靠性。TLICS系统的有效性在一篇配套论文中进行评估。方法:回顾性分析一家一级创伤中心的急性创伤性胸腰椎骨折儿科患者的病历。使用CT和MRI为每位患者计算TLICS,并结合患者病历中记录的神经学检查结果。将TLICS与所接受的治疗类型进行比较。五位评估者分别对所有患者进行评分,以评估评分者间的可靠性。结果:完成了81例患者的TLICS计算。患者平均年龄为10.9岁。女孩占研究人群的51.8%,80%的研究患者为白人。最常见的损伤机制是机动车事故(60.5%)、跌倒(17.3%)和全地形车事故(8.6%)。平均TLICS为3.7±2.8。33.3%的患者选择手术治疗。TLICS建议的治疗与实际接受的治疗之间的一致性具有统计学意义(p<0.0001)。TLICS系统的评分者间可靠性从中度到非常好不等,所有患者中TLICS治疗建议的Fleiss广义kappa(κ)值为0.69;然而,当使用MRI来计算TLICS时,评分者间可靠性降低。仅使用CT的患者与使用CT/MRI或仅使用MRI的患者相比,κ值分别从0.73降至0.57(p<0.0001)。此外,当将MRI用作损伤评估的一部分时,建议治疗与实际治疗之间的一致性更差。结论:TLICS系统在评估儿科患者胸腰椎骨折治疗方案的医生中显示出良好的评分者间可靠性。医生在使用MRI辅助手术决策过程时应谨慎。