Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Jul;10(4):419-33. doi: 10.1177/1745691615588092.
From drop-down computer menus to department-store aisles, people in everyday life often choose from simultaneous displays of products or options. Studies of position effects in such choices show seemingly inconsistent results. For example, in restaurant choice, items enjoy an advantage when placed at the beginning or end of the menu listings, but in multiple-choice tests, answers are more popular when placed in the middle of the offered list. When reaching for a bottle on a supermarket shelf, bottles in the middle of the display are more popular. But on voting ballots, first is the most advantageous position. Some of the effects are quite sensible, whereas others are harder to justify and can aptly be regarded as biases. This article attempts to put position effects into a unified and coherent framework and to account for them simply by using a small number of familiar psychological principles.
从下拉式电脑菜单到百货公司的货架,人们在日常生活中经常从同时呈现的产品或选项中进行选择。对这种选择中的位置效应的研究显示出看似不一致的结果。例如,在餐厅选择中,当菜品位于菜单列表的开头或结尾时,它们会有优势,但在多项选择题测试中,答案在提供的列表中间时更受欢迎。在超市货架上伸手拿瓶子时,中间展示的瓶子更受欢迎。但在投票中,首选是最有利的位置。其中一些影响是相当合理的,而其他的则更难解释,可以恰当地视为偏见。本文试图将位置效应纳入一个统一而连贯的框架,并通过使用少数几个熟悉的心理学原理来简单地解释它们。