• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巧妙地鼓励更审慎的决策:运用强制技术和群体刻板印象来探究自由意志。

Subtly encouraging more deliberate decisions: using a forcing technique and population stereotype to investigate free will.

作者信息

Pailhès Alice, Kuhn Gustav

机构信息

Psychology Department, Goldsmiths, University of London, New Cross, London, SE14 6NW, UK.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2021 Jun;85(4):1380-1390. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01350-z. Epub 2020 May 14.

DOI:10.1007/s00426-020-01350-z
PMID:32409896
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8211612/
Abstract

Magicians' forcing techniques allow them to covertly influence spectators' choices. We used a type of force (Position Force) to investigate whether explicitly informing people that they are making a decision results in more deliberate decisions. The magician placed four face-down cards on the table in a horizontal row, after which the spectator was asked to select a card by pushing it forward. According to magicians and position effects literature, people should be more likely to choose a card in the third position from their left, because it can be easily reached. We manipulated whether participants were reminded that they were making a decision (explicit choice) or not (implicit choice) when asked to select one of the cards. Two experiments confirmed the efficiency of the Position Force-52% of participants chose the target card. Explicitly informing participants of the decision impairs the success of the force, leading to a more deliberate choice. A range of awareness measures illustrates that participants were unaware of their stereotypical behaviours. Participants who chose the target card significantly underestimated the number of people who would have chosen the same card, and felt as free as the participants who chose another card. Finally, we tested an embodied-cognition idea, but our data suggest that different ways of holding an object do not affect the level of self-control they have over their actions. Results are discussed in terms of theoretical implications regarding free will, Wegner's apparent mental causation, choice blindness and reachability effects.

摘要

魔术师的强迫技巧使他们能够暗中影响观众的选择。我们使用了一种强迫方式(位置强迫)来研究明确告知人们他们正在做决定是否会导致更审慎的决定。魔术师将四张面朝下的牌水平排成一排放在桌子上,然后要求观众向前推一张牌来进行选择。根据魔术师和位置效应文献,人们应该更有可能选择从左边数第三个位置的牌,因为它很容易够到。我们操控了在要求参与者选牌时,他们是否被提醒自己正在做决定(明确选择)或未被提醒(隐含选择)。两项实验证实了位置强迫的有效性——52%的参与者选择了目标牌。明确告知参与者他们正在做决定会削弱强迫的成功率,并导致更审慎的选择。一系列的意识测量表明参与者并未意识到他们的刻板行为。选择目标牌的参与者显著低估了会选择同一张牌的人数,并且感觉和选择其他牌的参与者一样自由。最后,我们测试了一个具身认知的观点,但我们的数据表明,持有物体的不同方式并不会影响他们对自身行为的自我控制程度。我们将根据关于自由意志、韦格纳的明显心理因果关系、选择盲视和可达性效应的理论意义来讨论这些结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a18/8211612/48f733a0c39a/426_2020_1350_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a18/8211612/48cd02343985/426_2020_1350_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a18/8211612/591280f5e276/426_2020_1350_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a18/8211612/f4401c9c7661/426_2020_1350_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a18/8211612/d44f481bbcac/426_2020_1350_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a18/8211612/df9b853b7360/426_2020_1350_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a18/8211612/48f733a0c39a/426_2020_1350_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a18/8211612/48cd02343985/426_2020_1350_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a18/8211612/591280f5e276/426_2020_1350_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a18/8211612/f4401c9c7661/426_2020_1350_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a18/8211612/d44f481bbcac/426_2020_1350_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a18/8211612/df9b853b7360/426_2020_1350_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a18/8211612/48f733a0c39a/426_2020_1350_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Subtly encouraging more deliberate decisions: using a forcing technique and population stereotype to investigate free will.巧妙地鼓励更审慎的决策:运用强制技术和群体刻板印象来探究自由意志。
Psychol Res. 2021 Jun;85(4):1380-1390. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01350-z. Epub 2020 May 14.
2
Influencing choice without awareness.在无意识的情况下影响选择。
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Dec;37:225-36. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
3
Forcing you to experience wonder: Unconsciously biasing people's choice through strategic physical positioning.迫使你体验奇迹:通过战略性的身体定位无意识地影响人们的选择。
Conscious Cogn. 2020 Apr;80:102902. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2020.102902. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
4
The apparent action causation: Using a magician forcing technique to investigate our illusory sense of agency over the outcome of our choices.明显的动作因果关系:使用魔术师强迫技术来研究我们对选择结果的虚幻代理感。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Nov;73(11):1784-1795. doi: 10.1177/1747021820932916. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
5
Influencing choices with conversational primes: How a magic trick unconsciously influences card choices.用对话提示影响选择:魔术如何无意识地影响纸牌选择。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jul 28;117(30):17675-17679. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2000682117. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
6
A psychologically based taxonomy of Magicians' forcing Techniques: How magicians influence our choices, and how to use this to study psychological mechanisms.基于心理学的魔术师强迫技巧分类法:魔术师如何影响我们的选择,以及如何利用这一点来研究心理机制。
Conscious Cogn. 2020 Nov;86:103038. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2020.103038. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
7
Mind Control Tricks: Magicians' Forcing and Free Will.心灵控制技巧:魔术师的强迫与自由意志。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 May;25(5):338-341. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.001. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
8
Forcing the issue: Little psychological influence in a magician's paradigm.强行介入:魔术师范式中小的心理影响。
Conscious Cogn. 2020 Sep;84:103002. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2020.103002. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
9
Choosing in freedom or forced to choose? Introspective blindness to psychological forcing in stage-magic.选择是自由的还是被迫的?舞台魔术中对心理强制的内省性盲目。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58254. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058254. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
10
The magician's choice: Providing illusory choice and sense of agency with the equivoque forcing technique.魔术师的选择:运用模棱两可的强迫技巧提供虚幻的选择和自主感。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Jul;150(7):1358-1372. doi: 10.1037/xge0000929. Epub 2020 Nov 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Negative vs. Positive Psychology: a Review of Science of Well-Being.消极心理学与积极心理学:幸福科学综述
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2024 Dec;58(4):1091-1122. doi: 10.1007/s12124-022-09708-1. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
2
Influencing choices with conversational primes: How a magic trick unconsciously influences card choices.用对话提示影响选择:魔术如何无意识地影响纸牌选择。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jul 28;117(30):17675-17679. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2000682117. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
3
Magic Curiosity Arousing Tricks (MagicCATs): A novel stimulus collection to induce epistemic emotions.

本文引用的文献

1
A psychologically based taxonomy of Magicians' forcing Techniques: How magicians influence our choices, and how to use this to study psychological mechanisms.基于心理学的魔术师强迫技巧分类法:魔术师如何影响我们的选择,以及如何利用这一点来研究心理机制。
Conscious Cogn. 2020 Nov;86:103038. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2020.103038. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
2
Forcing you to experience wonder: Unconsciously biasing people's choice through strategic physical positioning.迫使你体验奇迹:通过战略性的身体定位无意识地影响人们的选择。
Conscious Cogn. 2020 Apr;80:102902. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2020.102902. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
3
A massive experiment on choice blindness in political decisions: Confidence, confabulation, and unconscious detection of self-deception.
魔术好奇心激发技巧(MagicCATs):一种新颖的刺激物集合,可诱发认知情绪。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Feb;53(1):188-215. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01431-2.
一项关于政治决策中选择盲视的大规模实验:自信、虚构及对自我欺骗的无意识察觉。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 14;12(2):e0171108. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171108. eCollection 2017.
4
The poverty of embodied cognition.具身认知的匮乏。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Aug;23(4):959-78. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0860-1.
5
Nudging consumers towards healthier choices: a systematic review of positional influences on food choice.引导消费者做出更健康的选择:对食物选择中位置影响的系统评价。
Br J Nutr. 2016 Jun;115(12):2252-63. doi: 10.1017/S0007114516001653.
6
Deciding How To Decide: Self-Control and Meta-Decision Making.决策的决策:自我控制与元决策。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Nov;19(11):700-710. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.013. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
7
Position Effects in Choice From Simultaneous Displays: A Conundrum Solved.同时呈现条件下选择中的位置效应:难题解决。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Jul;10(4):419-33. doi: 10.1177/1745691615588092.
8
Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate.双重加工理论的高阶认知:推进辩论。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 May;8(3):223-41. doi: 10.1177/1745691612460685.
9
The evolution and devolution of cognitive control: The costs of deliberation in a competitive world.认知控制的进化与退化:竞争世界中深思熟虑的代价。
Sci Rep. 2015 Jun 16;5:11002. doi: 10.1038/srep11002.
10
Influencing choice without awareness.在无意识的情况下影响选择。
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Dec;37:225-36. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Feb 7.