Erickson Kevin F, Winkelmayer Wolfgang C, Chertow Glenn M, Bhattacharya Jay
Division of Nephrology and Centers for Health Policy and Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Departments of Medicine and Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA.
Forum Health Econ Policy. 2014 Jan 1;17(1):53-77. doi: 10.1515/fhep-2012-0018.
The relation between the quantity of many healthcare services delivered and health outcomes is uncertain. In January 2004, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services introduced a tiered fee-for-service system for patients on hemodialysis, creating an incentive for providers to see patients more frequently. We analyzed the effect of this change on patient mortality, transplant wait-listing, and costs. While mortality rates for Medicare beneficiaries on hemodialysis declined after reimbursement reform, mortality declined more - or was no different - among patients whose providers were not affected by the economic incentive. Similarly, improved placement of patients on the kidney transplant waitlist was no different among patients whose providers were not affected by the economic incentive; payments for dialysis visits increased 13.7% in the year following reform. The payment system designed to increase provider visits to hemodialysis patients increased Medicare costs with no evidence of a benefit on survival or kidney transplant listing.
许多已提供的医疗服务数量与健康结果之间的关系尚不确定。2004年1月,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心为接受血液透析的患者引入了分级按服务付费系统,促使医疗服务提供者更频繁地诊治患者。我们分析了这一变化对患者死亡率、进入移植等待名单以及成本的影响。虽然报销改革后,接受血液透析的医疗保险受益人的死亡率有所下降,但在其医疗服务提供者未受经济激励影响的患者中,死亡率下降幅度更大或没有差异。同样,在其医疗服务提供者未受经济激励影响的患者中,进入肾脏移植等待名单的情况改善程度并无不同;改革后的一年中,透析就诊费用增加了13.7%。旨在增加医疗服务提供者对血液透析患者诊治次数的支付系统增加了医疗保险成本,且没有证据表明对生存或进入肾脏移植等待名单有任何益处。