Suppr超能文献

工作人员对参与欧洲癌症认证计划所带来变化的看法:来自八个癌症中心的简要情况

Staff perceptions of change resulting from participation in a European cancer accreditation programme: a snapshot from eight cancer centres.

作者信息

Rajan Abinaya, Wind Anke, Saghatchian Mahasti, Thonon Frederique, Boomsma Femke, van Harten Wim H

机构信息

The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam 1066CX, The Netherlands.

Institut Gustave Roussy, 14 rue Edouard-Vaillant, Villejuif 94805, France ; Organisation of European Cancer Institutes (OECI-EEIG) c/o Fondation Universitaire, 11 Rue d'Egmont, Brussels B-1000, Belgium.

出版信息

Ecancermedicalscience. 2015 Jun 23;9:547. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2015.547. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Healthcare accreditation is considered to be an essential quality improvement tool. However, its effectiveness has been critiqued.

METHODS

Twenty-four interviews were conducted with clinicians (five), nurses (six), managers (eight), and basic/translational researchers (five) from eight European cancer centres on changes observed from participating in a European cancer accreditation programme. Data were thematically analysed and verified with participants and checked against auditor's feedback.

RESULTS

Four change categories emerged: (i) the growing importance of the nursing and supportive care field (role change). Nurses gained more autonomy/clarity on their daily duties. Importance was given to the hiring and training of supportive care personnel (ii) critical thinking on data integration (strategic change). Managers gained insight on how to integrate institutional level data (iii) improved processes within multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings (procedural change). Clinical staff experienced improved communication between MDTs (iv) building trust (organisational change). Accreditation improved the centre's credibility with its own staff and externally with funders and patients. No motivational changes were perceived. Researchers perceived no changes. The auditor's feedback included changes in 13 areas: translational research, biobanks, clinical trials, patient privacy and satisfaction, cancer registries, clinical practice guidelines, patient education, screening, primary prevention, role of nurses, MDT, supportive care, and data integration. However, our study revealed that staff perceived changes only in the last four areas.

CONCLUSION

Staff perceived changes in data integration, nursing and supportive care, and in certain clinical aspects. Accreditation programmes must pay attention to the needs of different stakeholder groups, track changes, and observe how/why change happens.

摘要

背景

医疗保健认证被认为是一种重要的质量改进工具。然而,其有效性受到了批评。

方法

对来自八个欧洲癌症中心的临床医生(5名)、护士(6名)、管理人员(8名)和基础/转化研究人员(5名)进行了24次访谈,了解他们从参与欧洲癌症认证计划中观察到的变化。对数据进行了主题分析,并与参与者进行了核实,并与审核员的反馈进行了核对。

结果

出现了四类变化:(i)护理和支持性护理领域的重要性日益增加(角色变化)。护士在日常工作中获得了更多自主权/清晰度。重视支持性护理人员的招聘和培训(ii)对数据整合的批判性思考(战略变化)。管理人员对如何整合机构层面的数据有了深入了解(iii)多学科团队(MDT)会议内流程的改进(程序变化)。临床工作人员体验到MDT之间沟通的改善(iv)建立信任(组织变化)。认证提高了该中心在内部员工以及外部资助者和患者中的可信度。未察觉到动机方面的变化。研究人员未察觉到变化。审核员的反馈包括13个领域的变化:转化研究、生物样本库、临床试验、患者隐私和满意度、癌症登记、临床实践指南、患者教育、筛查、一级预防、护士角色、MDT、支持性护理和数据整合。然而,我们的研究表明,工作人员仅在最后四个领域察觉到了变化。

结论

工作人员察觉到了数据整合、护理和支持性护理以及某些临床方面的变化。认证计划必须关注不同利益相关者群体的需求,跟踪变化,并观察变化如何/为何发生。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88c2/4494818/8b10be0082e1/can-9-547fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验