Alkhenizan Abdullah, Shaw Charles
King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ann Saudi Med. 2011 Jul-Aug;31(4):407-16. doi: 10.4103/0256-4947.83204.
Accreditation is usually a voluntary program in which trained external peer reviewers evaluate a healthcare organization's compliance and compare it with pre-established performance standards. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of accreditation programs on the quality of healthcare services
We did a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the impact of accreditation programs on the quality of healthcare services. Several databases were systematically searched, including Medline, Embase, Healthstar, and Cinhal.
Twenty-six studies evaluating the impact of accreditation were identified. The majority of the studies showed general accreditation for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), trauma, ambulatory surgical care, infection control and pain management; and subspecialty accreditation programs to significantly improve the process of care provided by healthcare services by improving the structure and organization of healthcare facilities. Several studies showed that general accreditation programs significantly improve clinical outcomes and the quality of care of these clinical conditions and showed a significant positive impact of subspecialty accreditation programs in improving clinical outcomes in different subspecialties, including sleep medicine, chest pain management and trauma management.
There is consistent evidence that shows that accreditation programs improve the process of care provided by healthcare services. There is considerable evidence to show that accreditation programs improve clinical outcomes of a wide spectrum of clinical conditions. Accreditation programs should be supported as a tool to improve the quality of healthcare services.
认证通常是一项自愿参与的项目,由经过培训的外部同行评审员评估医疗机构的合规情况,并将其与预先设定的绩效标准进行比较。本研究的目的是评估认证项目对医疗服务质量的影响。
我们对文献进行了系统综述,以评估认证项目对医疗服务质量的影响。系统检索了多个数据库,包括医学期刊数据库(Medline)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(Embase)、卫生之星数据库(Healthstar)和护理学与健康领域数据库(Cinhal)。
共确定了26项评估认证影响的研究。大多数研究表明,急性心肌梗死(AMI)、创伤、门诊手术护理、感染控制和疼痛管理的一般认证;以及专科认证项目通过改善医疗机构的结构和组织,显著改善了医疗服务所提供的护理过程。多项研究表明,一般认证项目显著改善了这些临床病症的临床结局和护理质量,并表明专科认证项目对改善包括睡眠医学、胸痛管理和创伤管理在内的不同专科的临床结局具有显著的积极影响。
有一致的证据表明,认证项目改善了医疗服务所提供的护理过程。有大量证据表明,认证项目改善了广泛临床病症的临床结局。认证项目应作为提高医疗服务质量的一种工具得到支持。