Enax Laura, Weber Bernd, Ahlers Maren, Kaiser Ulrike, Diethelm Katharina, Holtkamp Dominik, Faupel Ulya, Holzmüller Hartmut H, Kersting Mathilde
Department of Epileptology, University Hospital Bonn Bonn, Germany ; Department of NeuroCognition/Imaging, Life and Brain Center Bonn, Germany ; Center for Economics and Neuroscience, University of Bonn Bonn, Germany.
Research Institute of Child Nutrition, University of Bonn Dortmund, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 2;6:882. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00882. eCollection 2015.
Food marketing research shows that child-directed marketing cues have pronounced effects on food preferences and consumption, but are most often placed on products with low nutritional quality. Effects of child-directed marketing strategies for healthy food products remain to be studied in more detail. Previous research suggests that effort provision explains additional variance in food choice. This study investigated the effects of packaging cues on explicit preferences and effort provision for healthy food items in elementary school children. Each of 179 children rated three, objectively identical, recommended yogurt-cereal-fruit snacks presented with different packaging cues. Packaging cues included a plain label, a label focusing on health aspects of the product, and a label that additionally included unknown cartoon characters. The children were asked to state the subjective taste-pleasantness of the respective food items. We also used a novel approach to measure effort provision for food items in children, namely handgrip strength. Results show that packaging cues significantly induce a taste-placebo effect in 88% of the children, i.e., differences in taste ratings for objectively identical products. Taste ratings were highest for the child-directed product that included cartoon characters. Also, applied effort to receive the child-directed product was significantly higher. Our results confirm the positive effect of child-directed marketing strategies also for healthy snack food products. Using handgrip strength as a measure to determine the amount of effort children are willing to provide for a product may explain additional variance in food choice and might prove to be a promising additional research tool for field studies and the assessment of public policy interventions.
食品营销研究表明,针对儿童的营销线索对食品偏好和消费有显著影响,但这些线索大多出现在营养质量较低的产品上。针对健康食品的儿童导向营销策略的效果仍有待更详细的研究。先前的研究表明,付出努力可以解释食物选择中的额外差异。本研究调查了包装线索对小学生健康食品的明确偏好和付出努力的影响。179名儿童每人对三种客观上相同、但带有不同包装线索的推荐酸奶 - 谷物 - 水果零食进行评分。包装线索包括普通标签、注重产品健康方面的标签以及额外包含不知名卡通人物的标签。孩子们被要求说出各自食品的主观口味愉悦度。我们还采用了一种新颖的方法来衡量儿童对食品付出的努力,即握力。结果表明,包装线索在88%的儿童中显著诱发了味觉安慰剂效应,即客观上相同产品的口味评分存在差异。带有卡通人物的儿童导向产品的口味评分最高。此外,为获得儿童导向产品所付出的努力也显著更高。我们的结果证实了儿童导向营销策略对健康休闲食品也有积极影响。使用握力作为衡量儿童愿意为产品付出努力程度的指标,可能会解释食物选择中的额外差异,并且可能被证明是实地研究和公共政策干预评估中一种有前景的额外研究工具。