• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

陈述性共同注意作为心理理论的基础。

Declarative joint attention as a foundation of theory of mind.

作者信息

Sodian Beate, Kristen-Antonow Susanne

机构信息

Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich.

出版信息

Dev Psychol. 2015 Sep;51(9):1190-200. doi: 10.1037/dev0000039. Epub 2015 Jul 20.

DOI:10.1037/dev0000039
PMID:26192041
Abstract

Theories of social-cognitive development have attributed a foundational role to declarative joint attention. The present longitudinal study of 83 children, who were assessed on a battery of social-cognitive tasks at multiple measurement points from the age of 12 to 50 months, tested a predictive model of theory of mind (false-belief understanding). Thereby, declarative, but not imperative, point production predicted false-belief understanding at 50 months. Predictive relations, which remained significant beyond the influence of child gender and language abilities, and were unrelated to child temperament and emotion recognition, were not mediated by mirror self-recognition or Level 1 visual perspective taking, which were both related to joint attention. These findings conform to theoretical predictions and provide empirical support for conceptual continuity in the social domain.

摘要

社会认知发展理论认为陈述性联合注意具有基础性作用。本纵向研究对83名儿童进行了跟踪,从12个月到50个月期间在多个测量点对他们进行了一系列社会认知任务评估,测试了心理理论(错误信念理解)的预测模型。结果发现,陈述性(而非祈使性)的指物行为能够预测50个月大时的错误信念理解。这种预测关系在排除儿童性别和语言能力的影响后仍然显著,且与儿童气质和情绪识别无关,同时也不是由与联合注意相关的镜像自我识别或一级视觉视角采择所介导的。这些发现符合理论预测,并为社会领域的概念连续性提供了实证支持。

相似文献

1
Declarative joint attention as a foundation of theory of mind.陈述性共同注意作为心理理论的基础。
Dev Psychol. 2015 Sep;51(9):1190-200. doi: 10.1037/dev0000039. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
2
The roles of maternal mind-mindedness and infant security of attachment in predicting preschoolers' understanding of visual perspective taking and false belief.母亲心理理论和婴儿依恋安全性在预测学龄前儿童理解视觉观点采择和错误信念中的作用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2014 Sep;125:48-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.02.005. Epub 2014 May 9.
3
Representation and theory of mind development.表象与心理理论的发展。
Dev Psychol. 2012 Mar;48(2):509-20. doi: 10.1037/a0025663. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
4
The origins of children's metamemory: the role of theory of mind.儿童元记忆的起源:心理理论的作用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2015 Mar;131:56-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.11.005. Epub 2014 Dec 13.
5
Continuity from an implicit to an explicit understanding of false belief from infancy to preschool age.从婴儿期到学前阶段,对错误信念的理解从内隐到外显的连续性。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2012 Mar;30(Pt 1):172-87. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02067.x. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
6
Cumulative risk disparities in children's neurocognitive functioning: a developmental cascade model.儿童神经认知功能的累积风险差异:一种发展级联模型。
Dev Sci. 2016 Mar;19(2):179-94. doi: 10.1111/desc.12302. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
7
Infant attention to intentional action predicts preschool theory of mind.婴儿对有意行为的关注可预测其学前心理理论。
Dev Psychol. 2008 Mar;44(2):618-23. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.618.
8
Understanding of Goals, Beliefs, and Desires Predicts Morally Relevant Theory of Mind: A Longitudinal Investigation.对目标、信念和欲望的理解可预测与道德相关的心理理论:一项纵向调查。
Child Dev. 2016 Jul;87(4):1221-32. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12533. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
9
Testing the stability of theory of mind: A longitudinal approach.测试心理理论的稳定性:一种纵向研究方法。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 5;15(11):e0241721. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241721. eCollection 2020.
10
Scaling of Advanced Theory-of-Mind Tasks.高级心理理论任务的量表编制
Child Dev. 2016 Nov;87(6):1971-1991. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12566. Epub 2016 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Mind-mindedness in mothers of infants with excessive crying/sleeping/eating disorders.患有过度哭闹/睡眠/进食障碍婴儿的母亲的心理-mindedness(此处mind-mindedness可能有误,推测可能是mind-mindedness,可译为“心智化”之类,需确认原文准确性)
Front Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 May 23;3:1331016. doi: 10.3389/frcha.2024.1331016. eCollection 2024.
2
The Origins of Theory of Mind in Infant Social Cognition: Investigating Longitudinal Pathways from Intention Understanding and Joint Attention to Preschool Theory of Mind.婴儿社会认知中心理理论的起源:探究从意图理解和共同注意到学前心理理论的纵向路径
J Cogn Dev. 2023;24(3):375-396. doi: 10.1080/15248372.2022.2146117. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
3
When do toddlers point during mealtime?: Pointing in the second year of life in everyday situations.
幼儿在进餐时间何时会指物?:第二年生活中日常情境下的指物行为
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 26;14:1050975. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1050975. eCollection 2023.
4
Responding to joint attention as a developmental catalyst: Longitudinal associations with language and social responsiveness.回应共同注意作为发展的催化剂:与语言和社会反应性的纵向关联。
Infancy. 2023 Mar;28(2):339-366. doi: 10.1111/infa.12515. Epub 2022 Nov 20.
5
Cognitive predictors of Social processing in congenital atypical development.先天性非典型发育中社会加工的认知预测因素。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2023 Sep;53(9):3343-3355. doi: 10.1007/s10803-022-05630-y. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
6
Early impact of X- and Y-chromosome variations (XXX, XXY, XYY) on social communication and social emotional development in 1-2-year-old children.1-2 岁儿童 X、Y 染色体变异(XXX、XXY、XYY)对社会交往和社会情感发展的早期影响。
Am J Med Genet A. 2022 Jul;188(7):1943-1953. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.62720. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
7
Sharing Experiences in Infancy: From Primary Intersubjectivity to Shared Intentionality.婴儿期的经验分享:从原初主体间性到共享意向性
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 14;12:667679. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.667679. eCollection 2021.
8
The Impact of Sex Chromosome Trisomies (XXX, XXY, XYY) on Early Social Cognition: Social Orienting, Joint Attention, and Theory of Mind.性染色体三体(XXX、XXY、XYY)对早期社会认知的影响:社会定向、共同注意和心理理论。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2022 Jan 17;37(1):63-77. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acab042.
9
Testing the stability of theory of mind: A longitudinal approach.测试心理理论的稳定性:一种纵向研究方法。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 5;15(11):e0241721. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241721. eCollection 2020.
10
How children come to understand false beliefs: A shared intentionality account.儿童如何理解错误信念:共享意向性解释。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Aug 21;115(34):8491-8498. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1804761115. Epub 2018 Aug 13.