Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708;
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Aug 21;115(34):8491-8498. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1804761115. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
To predict and explain the behavior of others, one must understand that their actions are determined not by reality but by their beliefs about reality. Classically, children come to understand beliefs, including false beliefs, at about 4-5 y of age, but recent studies using different response measures suggest that even infants (and apes!) have some skills as well. Resolving this discrepancy is not possible with current theories based on individual cognition. Instead, what is needed is an account recognizing that the key processes in constructing an understanding of belief are social and mental coordination with other persons and their (sometimes conflicting) perspectives. Engaging in such social and mental coordination involves species-unique skills and motivations of shared intentionality, especially as they are manifest in joint attention and linguistic communication, as well as sophisticated skills of executive function to coordinate the different perspectives involved. This shared intentionality account accords well with documented differences in the cognitive capacities of great apes and human children, and it explains why infants and apes pass some versions of false-belief tasks whereas only older children pass others.
为了预测和解释他人的行为,人们必须认识到,他们的行为不是由现实决定的,而是由他们对现实的信念决定的。经典理论认为,儿童在 4-5 岁左右开始理解信念,包括错误信念,但最近使用不同反应测量方法的研究表明,即使是婴儿(和猿类!)也有一些相关技能。目前基于个体认知的理论无法解决这一差异。相反,需要的是一种解释,即认识到构建信念理解的关键过程是与他人及其(有时是相互冲突的)观点进行社会和心理协调。参与这种社会和心理协调需要独特的物种技能和共同意向的动机,尤其是在共同关注和语言交流中表现出来的技能,以及协调所涉及的不同观点的复杂执行功能技能。这种共同意向解释与记录在案的类人猿和人类儿童认知能力的差异相符,它解释了为什么婴儿和猿类通过了一些错误信念任务,而只有年龄较大的儿童通过了其他任务。