Bossong B
Fachbereich Psychologie, Universität Koblenz-Landau, Im Fort 7, 76829, Landau, Germany.
Hum Nat. 2001 Jun;12(2):107-22. doi: 10.1007/s12110-001-1019-5.
By analyzing legacies in California from 1890 to 1984 Judge and Hrdy (1992) detected a gender-related difference: Men with children were statistically more likely to leave all of their property to a wife than were mothers to a husband. The authors argue that men were more likely than women to remarry and have additional children. Thus, in order to transfer their wealth to their mutual children, men can leave it to their wives but women can avoid risks by giving it to the children directly. This hypothesis was tested by two experiments in which subjects were asked to put themselves in the position of a person writing a will and allocate the wealth to the surviving spouse and the children. Age and sex of the heir/heiress were experimentally varied. The results support the inclusive fitness interpretation.
通过分析1890年至1984年加利福尼亚州的遗产情况,贾奇和赫迪(1992年)发现了一种与性别相关的差异:从统计学角度来看,有子女的男性比有子女的母亲更有可能将其所有财产留给妻子。作者认为,男性比女性更有可能再婚并生育更多子女。因此,为了将财富转移给他们共同的子女,男性可以将财富留给妻子,而女性则可以通过直接将财富给予子女来规避风险。这一假设通过两项实验进行了检验,在实验中,要求受试者设身处地为立遗嘱者,并将财富分配给在世配偶和子女。继承人的年龄和性别在实验中有所变化。结果支持了广义适合度的解释。