• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

藻酸钙敷料与负压封闭引流的比较:一项临床试验。

Comparing Calcium Alginate Dressings to Vacuum-assisted Closure: A Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Vassallo Ian Mario, Formosa Cynthia

机构信息

Department of Health, Valletta, Malta.

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malta, Msida, Malta Address correspondence to: Cynthia Formosa, PhD, SR Pod, MPodA Faculty of Health Sciences University of Malta Tal-Qroqq Msida, Malta

出版信息

Wounds. 2015 Jul;27(7):180-90.

PMID:26192736
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Several treatment modalities and protocols for arterial wound ulcers are available; however, little consensus exists on which treatment modality provides the best results. The present study sought to compare and evaluate the clinical efficacy of vacuum-assisted closure wound therapy to calcium alginate dressings in the treatment of neuroischemic diabetic foot ulceration.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A single-center quasi-experimental matched subject clinical trial was conducted on 30 subjects living with type 2 diabetes and presenting with a newly diagnosed neuroischemic foot ulceration. Subjects were divided into 2 groups. Group A (n = 15) underwent negative pressure wound therapy and Group B (n =15) underwent treatment using calcium alginate dressings. Ulcer area and depth were measured during the trial.

RESULTS

Both negative pressure therapy and calcium alginate dressings were effective in reducing the surface area and depth of ulcers (P = 0.0001). However, negative pressure was 3.2 times more effective in reducing surface area and 3.78 times more effective in reducing depth of ulcers when compared to calcium alginate (P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Vacuum-assisted closure should be considered as the treatment of choice for neuroischemic ulceration owing to its advantages in reducing surface area and depth when compared to calcium alginate dressings. Improved care could result in improved health outcomes, improved quality of life, and fewer diabetes-related foot complications.

摘要

引言

目前有多种治疗动脉创伤性溃疡的方法和方案;然而,对于哪种治疗方法能取得最佳效果,几乎没有达成共识。本研究旨在比较和评估负压封闭引流伤口治疗与藻酸钙敷料在治疗神经缺血性糖尿病足溃疡方面的临床疗效。

材料与方法

对30名2型糖尿病患者且新诊断为神经缺血性足部溃疡的患者进行了一项单中心准实验性匹配受试者临床试验。受试者分为两组。A组(n = 15)接受负压伤口治疗,B组(n = 15)使用藻酸钙敷料进行治疗。在试验期间测量溃疡面积和深度。

结果

负压治疗和藻酸钙敷料均能有效减少溃疡的表面积和深度(P = 0.0001)。然而,与藻酸钙相比,负压在减少溃疡表面积方面的效果是其3.2倍,在减少溃疡深度方面的效果是其3.78倍(P = 0.0001)。

结论

由于负压封闭引流在减少溃疡表面积和深度方面比藻酸钙敷料更具优势,应将其视为神经缺血性溃疡的首选治疗方法。改善护理可带来更好的健康结果、更高的生活质量以及更少的糖尿病相关足部并发症。

相似文献

1
Comparing Calcium Alginate Dressings to Vacuum-assisted Closure: A Clinical Trial.藻酸钙敷料与负压封闭引流的比较:一项临床试验。
Wounds. 2015 Jul;27(7):180-90.
2
Prospective randomized controlled study of Hydrofiber dressing containing ionic silver or calcium alginate dressings in non-ischaemic diabetic foot ulcers.含离子银水凝胶敷料或海藻酸钙敷料用于非缺血性糖尿病足溃疡的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Diabet Med. 2007 Mar;24(3):280-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02079.x.
3
A randomised study of NPWT closure versus alginate dressings in peri-vascular groin infections: quality of life, pain and cost.一项关于负压伤口治疗封闭法与藻酸盐敷料治疗血管周围腹股沟感染的随机研究:生活质量、疼痛与成本
J Wound Care. 2015 Jun;24(6):252, 254-6, 258-0. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2015.24.6.252.
4
Efficacy and tolerance of calcium alginate versus vaseline gauze dressings in the treatment of diabetic foot lesions.海藻酸钙与凡士林纱布敷料治疗糖尿病足溃疡的疗效及耐受性比较
Diabetes Metab. 2002 Jun;28(3):223-9.
5
Comparison of negative pressure wound therapy using vacuum-assisted closure with advanced moist wound therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.负压伤口治疗(使用真空辅助闭合)与先进湿性伤口治疗在糖尿病足溃疡治疗中的比较:一项多中心随机对照试验
Diabetes Care. 2008 Apr;31(4):631-6. doi: 10.2337/dc07-2196. Epub 2007 Dec 27.
6
Prospective, randomized, multi-institutional clinical trial of a silver alginate dressing to reduce lower extremity vascular surgery wound complications.一项关于藻酸盐银敷料减少下肢血管手术伤口并发症的前瞻性、随机、多机构临床试验。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Feb;61(2):419-427.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.07.034. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
7
Vacuum assisted closure improves the quality of life in patients with diabetic foot.负压封闭引流术改善糖尿病足患者的生活质量。
Acta Chir Belg. 2011 Sep-Oct;111(5):298-302.
8
Microbial alginate dressings show improved binding capacity for pathophysiological factors in chronic wounds compared to commercial alginate dressings of marine origin.与海洋来源的商业藻酸盐敷料相比,微生物藻酸盐敷料对慢性伤口中的病理生理因素显示出更高的结合能力。
J Biomater Appl. 2017 Apr;31(9):1267-1276. doi: 10.1177/0885328217702173. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
9
Clinical trial comparing 3 different wound dressings for the management of partial-thickness skin graft donor sites.比较三种不同创面敷贴在处理部分厚度皮肤移植供区创面的临床试验。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2011 Nov-Dec;38(6):643-7. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e3182349d2f.
10
Healing properties of calcium alginate dressings.海藻酸钙敷料的愈合特性。
J Wound Care. 1996 Sep;5(8):357-62.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of negative pressure wound therapy on the outcome of diabetic foot ulcers: A meta-analysis.负压伤口疗法对糖尿病足溃疡结局的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2024 Apr;21(4):e14886. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14886.
2
Photo-crosslinking hydrogel for wound healing in a pilonidal sinus patient after open surgery.用于藏毛窦患者开放性手术后伤口愈合的光交联水凝胶
J Surg Case Rep. 2023 May 3;2023(5):rjad152. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjad152. eCollection 2023 May.
3
A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial on the efficacy of a single-use negative pressure wound therapy system, compared to traditional negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of chronic ulcers of the lower extremities.
一项关于一次性负压伤口治疗系统疗效的前瞻性、随机、对照临床试验,与传统负压伤口治疗相比,用于治疗下肢慢性溃疡。
Wound Repair Regen. 2019 Sep;27(5):519-529. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12727. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
4
Negative pressure wound therapy for treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus.负压伤口治疗在糖尿病患者足部伤口治疗中的应用
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 17;10(10):CD010318. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010318.pub3.
5
Evaluation of negative-pressure wound therapy for patients with diabetic foot ulcers: systematic review and meta-analysis.糖尿病足溃疡患者负压伤口治疗的评估:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2017 Apr 18;13:533-544. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S131193. eCollection 2017.