Doctor in Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Cell Culture and Wound Healing Research Laboratory, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2011 Nov-Dec;38(6):643-7. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e3182349d2f.
A review of the literature reveals a lack of consensus regarding local management of skin graft donor sites. This study was undertaken to determine the effects of 3 different dressings on healing of donor sites and patient discomfort related to donor sites.
This study is a comparison cohort study.
We recruited 34 burn patients scheduled for partial-thickness skin grafts; their mean age was 36 ± 18 years (mean ± SD, range 20 to 54 years), and 63% were male. All subjects were managed at Burn Unity Care, located in Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Subjects were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 groups: (1) a study group (group A) whose donor sites were dressed with a bovine collagen calcium-alginate dressing covered with transparent polyurethane film; (2) a second intervention group (group B), whose donor sites were dressed only with transparent polyurethane film dressing; and (3) a control group whose donor sites were dressed with rayon soaked in 0.9% saline (group C). Two independent observers assessed donor site wounds for epithelialization, scabbing, quantity and characteristics of exudate, and complications. Pain was measured using the visual analog scale, the brief pain inventory, and Index of Pain Management.
Subjects managed with the bovine collagen calcium-alginate dressing covered with transparent polyurethane film (group A) achieved the greatest epithelialization (6.3 vs 8.2 for thin film dressing only P < .02 and 6.3 vs 11.7 days for control group P < .01). Patients managed with the bovine collagen calcium-alginate dressing covered with transparent polyurethane film also reported less pain that subjects allocated to the control (group C) or thin film only group (group B), (P < .05). Ninety percent of subjects allocated to the calcium alginate covered with thin film dressing reported mild pain intensity on the Visual Analog Scale, 85% of did not report pain localized to the donor site on the brief pain inventory, and scores on the Index of Pain Management ranged from 23 to 11.
Study findings suggest that use of a collagen calcium-alginate dressing with a transparent film covering reduces the time for complete epithelialization and may reduce pain related to skin graft donor sites.
文献回顾表明,对于皮肤移植物供区的局部处理方法尚未达成共识。本研究旨在确定 3 种不同敷料对供区愈合和与供区相关的患者不适的影响。
本研究为比较队列研究。
我们招募了 34 名计划接受部分厚度皮肤移植的烧伤患者;他们的平均年龄为 36 ± 18 岁(均值 ± 标准差,范围 20 至 54 岁),其中 63%为男性。所有受试者均在巴西圣保罗的烧伤联合护理中心接受治疗。
受试者随机分为 3 组:(1)实验组(A 组),其供区用牛胶原蛋白-钙-藻酸盐敷料覆盖透明聚氨酯薄膜;(2)第二干预组(B 组),供区仅用透明聚氨酯薄膜敷料;(3)对照组,供区用浸有 0.9%生理盐水的粘胶纤维(C 组)。两名独立观察者评估供区伤口的上皮化、结痂、渗出物的数量和特征以及并发症。疼痛使用视觉模拟评分法、简明疼痛量表和疼痛管理指数进行评估。
使用牛胶原蛋白-钙-藻酸盐敷料覆盖透明聚氨酯薄膜的受试者(A 组)的上皮化程度最大(仅使用薄膜敷料时为 6.3 天,与对照组相比差异有统计学意义[P <.02];与对照组相比差异有统计学意义[P <.01])。使用牛胶原蛋白-钙-藻酸盐敷料覆盖透明聚氨酯薄膜的患者报告的疼痛也少于对照组(C 组)或仅使用薄膜敷料的患者(B 组)(P <.05)。90%的使用透明薄膜覆盖钙藻酸盐敷料的受试者在视觉模拟评分法上报告疼痛强度为轻度,85%的受试者在简明疼痛量表上报告疼痛未局限于供区,疼痛管理指数的评分范围为 23 至 11。
研究结果表明,使用胶原蛋白-钙-藻酸盐敷料加透明薄膜覆盖可缩短完全上皮化的时间,并可能减轻与皮肤移植物供区相关的疼痛。