Suppr超能文献

血压与死亡率:在HUNT研究中使用子代血压作为自身血压的一种工具变量

Blood pressure and mortality: using offspring blood pressure as an instrument for own blood pressure in the HUNT study.

作者信息

Wade Kaitlin H, Carslake David, Nilsen Tom Ivar, Timpson Nicholas J, Davey Smith George, Romundstad Pål

机构信息

1] MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU) at the University of Bristol, Bristol UK [2] School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol UK.

Department of Public Health and General Practice, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2015 Jul 22;5:12399. doi: 10.1038/srep12399.

Abstract

Given that observational associations may be inaccurate, we used offspring blood pressure (BP) to provide alternative estimates of the associations between own BP and mortality. Observational associations between BP and mortality, estimated as hazard ratios (HRs) from Cox regression, were compared to HRs obtained using offspring BP as an instrumental variable (IV) for own BP (N = 32,227 mother-offspring and 27,535 father-offspring pairs). Observationally, there were positive associations between own BP and mortality from all-causes, cardiovascular disease (CVD), coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke and diabetes. Point estimates of the associations between BP and mortality from all-causes, CVD and CHD were amplified in magnitude when using offspring BP as an IV. For example, the HR for all-cause mortality per standard deviation (SD) increase in own systolic BP (SBP) obtained in conventional observational analyses increased from 1.10 (95% CI: 1.09-1.12; P < 0.0001) to 1.31 (95% CI: 1.19-1.43; P < 0.0001). Additionally, SBP was positively associated with diabetes and cancer mortality (HRs: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.12-3.35; P = 0.02 and 1.20; 95% CI: 1.02-1.42; P = 0.03, respectively), and diastolic BP (DBP) with stroke mortality (HR: 1.30; 95% CI: 1.02-1.66; P = 0.03). Results support positive associations between BP and mortality from all-causes, CVD, and CHD, SBP on cancer mortality, and DBP on stroke mortality.

摘要

鉴于观察性关联可能不准确,我们使用子代血压(BP)来提供自身血压与死亡率之间关联的替代估计值。将血压与死亡率之间的观察性关联(通过Cox回归估计为风险比[HRs])与使用子代血压作为自身血压的工具变量(IV)获得的HRs进行比较(N = 32227对母婴和27535对父子)。在观察性研究中,自身血压与全因死亡率、心血管疾病(CVD)、冠心病(CHD)、中风和糖尿病死亡率之间存在正相关。当使用子代血压作为IV时,血压与全因死亡率、CVD和CHD死亡率之间关联的点估计值在幅度上有所放大。例如,在传统观察性分析中,自身收缩压(SBP)每增加一个标准差(SD)的全因死亡率HR从1.10(95%CI:1.09 - 1.12;P < 0.0001)增加到1.31(95%CI:1.19 - 1.43;P < 0.0001)。此外,SBP与糖尿病和癌症死亡率呈正相关(HRs分别为:2.00;95%CI:1.12 - 3.35;P = 0.02和1.20;95%CI:1.02 - 1.42;P = 0.03),舒张压(DBP)与中风死亡率呈正相关(HR:1.30;95%CI:1.02 - 1.66;P = 0.03)。结果支持血压与全因死亡率、CVD和CHD死亡率之间的正相关,SBP与癌症死亡率之间的正相关,以及DBP与中风死亡率之间的正相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b13/4510525/b915d7b23579/srep12399-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验