• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

持续血压控制与冠心病、卒、心力衰竭及死亡率:ALLHAT 的观察性分析。

Sustained blood pressure control and coronary heart disease, stroke, heart failure, and mortality: An observational analysis of ALLHAT.

机构信息

Durham Veterans Affairs Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC), Durham, North Carolina.

Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019 Apr;21(4):451-459. doi: 10.1111/jch.13515. Epub 2019 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1111/jch.13515
PMID:30864748
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6532783/
Abstract

Achieving blood pressure (BP) control is associated with lower cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, but less is known about CVD risk associated with sustained BP control over time. This observational analysis of the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) was restricted to participants with four to seven visits with systolic BP (SBP) measurements during a 22-month period (n = 24 309). The authors categorized participants as having sustained BP control (SBP < 140 mm Hg) at 100%, 75% to <100%, 50% to <75%, and <50% of visits during this period. Outcomes included fatal coronary heart disease (CHD)/nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, heart failure (HF), a composite CVD outcome (fatal CHD/nonfatal MI, stroke, or HF), and mortality. Hazard ratios (HRs) for the association of category of sustained BP control for each outcome were obtained using proportional hazards models. SBP control was present among 20.0% of participants at 100%, 16.4% at 75% to less than 100%, 27.0% at 50% to less than 75%, and 36.6% at less than 50% of visits. Compared to those with SBP control at 100% visits, adjusted HR (95% CI) among those with SBP control at <50% of visits was 1.16 (0.93-1.44) for fatal CHD/nonfatal MI, 1.71 (1.26-2.32) for stroke, 1.63 (1.30-2.06) for HF, 1.39 (1.20-1.62) for the composite CVD outcome, and 1.14 (0.99-1.30) for mortality. Sustained SBP control may be beneficial for preventing stroke, HF, and CVD outcomes in adults taking antihypertensive medication.

摘要

实现血压(BP)控制与降低心血管疾病(CVD)风险相关,但对于随着时间的推移持续 BP 控制与 CVD 风险之间的关联知之甚少。本项针对抗高血压和降脂治疗预防心脏病发作试验(ALLHAT)的观察性分析仅限于在 22 个月期间进行了 4 至 7 次收缩压(SBP)测量的参与者(n=24309)。作者将参与者分为在该期间的 100%、75%至<100%、50%至<75%和<50%的访视中持续 BP 控制(SBP<140mmHg)的患者。结局包括致命性冠心病(CHD)/非致死性心肌梗死(MI)、卒中和心力衰竭(HF)、复合 CVD 结局(致命性 CHD/非致死性 MI、卒中和 HF)和死亡率。使用比例风险模型获得了每个结局的持续 BP 控制类别与风险比(HR)之间的关联。在 100%的访视中,20.0%的参与者存在 SBP 控制,16.4%在 75%至<100%的访视中,27.0%在 50%至<75%的访视中,36.6%在<50%的访视中。与在 100%的访视中 SBP 控制的参与者相比,在<50%的访视中 SBP 控制的参与者调整后的 HR(95%CI)为致命性 CHD/非致死性 MI 为 1.16(0.93-1.44),卒中和 HF 为 1.71(1.26-2.32),复合 CVD 结局为 1.63(1.30-2.06),死亡率为 1.14(0.99-1.30)。在服用抗高血压药物的成年人中,持续的 SBP 控制可能有益于预防卒中和 HF 以及 CVD 结局。

相似文献

1
Sustained blood pressure control and coronary heart disease, stroke, heart failure, and mortality: An observational analysis of ALLHAT.持续血压控制与冠心病、卒、心力衰竭及死亡率:ALLHAT 的观察性分析。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019 Apr;21(4):451-459. doi: 10.1111/jch.13515. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
2
Visit-to-Visit Variability of Blood Pressure and Coronary Heart Disease, Stroke, Heart Failure, and Mortality: A Cohort Study.血压的就诊间变异性与冠心病、中风、心力衰竭及死亡率:一项队列研究
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Sep 1;163(5):329-38. doi: 10.7326/M14-2803.
3
Mortality and morbidity during and after Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial: results by sex.抗高血压和降脂治疗预防心脏病发作试验期间和之后的死亡率和发病率:按性别分析的结果。
Hypertension. 2013 May;61(5):977-86. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.00213. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
4
Incident Cardiovascular Disease Among Adults With Blood Pressure <140/90 mm Hg.血压<140/90 mmHg的成年人中的心血管疾病事件
Circulation. 2017 Aug 29;136(9):798-812. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.027362. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
5
Association of Sustained Blood Pressure Control with Lower Risk for High-Cost Multimorbidities Among Medicare Beneficiaries in ALLHAT.ALLHAT 研究中,持续性血压控制与医疗保险受益人群发生高费用多病共存的风险降低相关。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Aug;36(8):2221-2229. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06623-w. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
6
Systolic blood pressure levels among adults with hypertension and incident cardiovascular events: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study.患有高血压和新发心血管事件的成年人的收缩压水平:社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Aug;174(8):1252-61. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.2482.
7
Visit-to-Visit Glycemic Variability and Risks of Cardiovascular Events and All-Cause Mortality: The ALLHAT Study.随访间血糖变异性与心血管事件及全因死亡率的关系:ALLHAT 研究。
Diabetes Care. 2019 Mar;42(3):486-493. doi: 10.2337/dc18-1430. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
8
Treatment-resistant hypertension and the incidence of cardiovascular disease and end-stage renal disease: results from the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT).抗高血压和降脂治疗预防心脏病发作试验(ALLHAT):治疗抵抗性高血压与心血管疾病和终末期肾病的发病率。
Hypertension. 2014 Nov;64(5):1012-21. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.03850. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
9
The Association Between Antihypertensive Medication Nonadherence and Visit-to-Visit Variability of Blood Pressure: Findings From the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial.降压药物治疗依从性与血压随诊间变异性的关联:降压和降脂治疗预防心脏病发作试验的结果
Hypertension. 2016 Jul;68(1):39-45. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.06960. Epub 2016 May 23.
10
Long-term renal and cardiovascular outcomes in Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) participants by baseline estimated GFR.在基线估计肾小球滤过率的情况下,抗高血压和降脂治疗预防心脏病发作试验(ALLHAT)参与者的长期肾脏和心血管结局。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012 Jun;7(6):989-1002. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07800811. Epub 2012 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and office blood pressure in primary health care of populations at a high risk of hypertension.在高血压高危人群的基层医疗保健中,动态血压监测与诊室血压监测的比较。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 11;10:985730. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.985730. eCollection 2022.
2
Temporal trends in cardiovascular care: Insights from the COVID-19 pandemic.心血管护理的时间趋势:来自COVID-19大流行的见解。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Nov 8;9:981023. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.981023. eCollection 2022.
3
Causal relationship between tea intake and cardiovascular diseases: A Mendelian randomization study.茶摄入量与心血管疾病之间的因果关系:一项孟德尔随机化研究。
Front Nutr. 2022 Sep 26;9:938201. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.938201. eCollection 2022.
4
Prevalence, risk factors, and cardiovascular disease outcomes associated with persistent blood pressure control: The Jackson Heart Study.持续性血压控制与流行情况、风险因素和心血管疾病结局的相关性:杰克逊心脏研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 5;17(8):e0270675. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270675. eCollection 2022.
5
Blood Pressure Control Among Non-Hispanic Black Adults Is Lower Than Non-Hispanic White Adults Despite Similar Treatment With Antihypertensive Medication: NHANES 2013-2018.尽管接受了相似的抗高血压药物治疗,但非西班牙裔黑人成年人的血压控制水平低于非西班牙裔白人成年人:NHANES 2013-2018。
Am J Hypertens. 2022 Jun 16;35(6):514-525. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpac011.
6
Blood Pressure Control Among Older Adults With Hypertension: Narrative Review and Introduction of a Framework for Improving Care.高血压老年患者的血压控制:叙述性综述及改善护理的框架介绍。
Am J Hypertens. 2021 Apr 2;34(3):258-266. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpab002.
7
Increased Medical Visits and Mortality among Adults with Cardiovascular Diseases in Severely Affected Areas after Typhoon Morakot.莫拉克台风重灾区成年人心血管疾病患者就诊次数增加和死亡率上升。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 8;17(18):6531. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186531.
8
Association of Sustained Blood Pressure Control with Multimorbidity Progression Among Older Adults.老年人持续性血压控制与多种疾病进展的关联。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Sep;68(9):2059-2066. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16558. Epub 2020 Jun 5.

本文引用的文献

1
2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2017美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/美国医师协会/美国心脏病学学会/美国预防医学学院/美国老年病学会/美国药学协会/美国血液学会/美国预防医学学会/美国医学协会/美国初级保健医师学会成人高血压预防、检测、评估和管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 May 15;71(19):e127-e248. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
2
Systematic Review for the 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2017 年 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA 高血压防治、检测、评估和管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组的报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 May 15;71(19):2176-2198. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.004. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
3
Association between long-term blood pressure control and ten-year progression in carotid arterial stiffness among hypertensive individuals: the multiethnic study of atherosclerosis.高血压患者长期血压控制与颈动脉僵硬度十年进展之间的关联:动脉粥样硬化的多民族研究
J Hypertens. 2017 Apr;35(4):862-869. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001199.
4
A Case for Less Intensive Blood Pressure Control: It Matters to Achieve Target Blood Pressure Early and Sustained Below 140/90mmHg.降压治疗宜适度:尽早达标并长期维持血压<140/90mmHg 至关重要
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2016 Nov-Dec;59(3):209-218. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2016.09.002. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
5
Trends in Antihypertensive Medication Discontinuation and Low Adherence Among Medicare Beneficiaries Initiating Treatment From 2007 to 2012.2007年至2012年开始接受治疗的医疗保险受益人中抗高血压药物停药和低依从性的趋势。
Hypertension. 2016 Sep;68(3):565-75. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.07720. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
6
Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes in Adults Aged ≥75 Years: A Randomized Clinical Trial.强化与标准血压控制对≥75岁成年人心血管疾病结局的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2016 Jun 28;315(24):2673-82. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.7050.
7
Importance of sustained and "tight" blood pressure control in patients with high cardiovascular risk.心血管高危患者持续且“严格”控制血压的重要性。
Blood Press. 2016;25(2):74-82. doi: 10.3109/08037051.2015.1127528. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
8
Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis.降压预防心血管疾病和死亡:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2016 Mar 5;387(10022):957-967. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01225-8. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
9
Cardiovascular outcomes at different on-treatment blood pressures in the hypertensive patients of the VALUE trial.VALUE 试验中高血压患者不同治疗时血压的心血管结局。
Eur Heart J. 2016 Mar 21;37(12):955-64. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv633. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
10
A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control.强化与标准血压控制的随机试验
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2103-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511939. Epub 2015 Nov 9.